The Tom Bearden

Help support the research



Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:43:02 -0600
Dear Richard,
No, I was never able to obtain that data.
What I did do was figure out the operative mechanism initiated by Priore in
the body itself, and how he initiated it.  That turned out to be quite
complicated, but even so it can be modeled in higher group symmetry
electrodynamics such as O(3) and possibly in quaternion EM.  It cannot be
modeled at all in U(1) electrodynamics nor in electrical engineering, both
of which are grossly deficient.
As a bonus, I also got the mechanism for the cellular changes
(dedifferentiation and redifferentiation) that Becker induced, and fairly
well resolved the actual nature of the cellular regenerative system's
mechanism.  Had Becker had higher group symmetry electrodynamics at his command, and had nonlinear phase conjugate optics been born in the 1960s when he was doing his work, Becker would have had it.  Or could have.  The scientists working with Priore were suffering under the same limitations and lack of knowledge.
However, once I understood the working mechanism in the body and in the cells (it is a physics mechanism and not a biochemical mechanism), I also discovered a way to dramatically advance and induce the effect with a new mechanism whereby the body itself provides all the complicated transductions of wave polarizations etc.  Instead of trying so painfully to make longitudinal EM waves externally (which are always accompanied by
time-polarized EM waves as well), one can cause all that to happen inside
the body and cells themselves.  So instead of radiation of the body by the
external mechanism for one or two hours, it can be done in 2 minutes or so, without longitudinal waves and all that, and achieve the same effects
(perhaps even better).  My associates and I are presently filing a rather
formidable patent application on this new process and mechanism (nearly 100 pages long) and its embodiments.
The problem is that a program to develop this area is going to be a very
expensive program.  Considering the number of scientists in France that have tried to replicate the Priore work, one can almost guarantee failure unless the fundamental mechanism is clearly understood at the beginning -- which neither Priore nor any of the associated team of scientists ever understood.
It is my impression that the French government did finally recognize at
least part of it -- the involvement of longitudinal EM waves and what can be done with them -- and did weaponize those, particularly in the form of
longitudinal EM wave interferometers. So much of the "French intractability" is because one is asking them for something right out of their highest classified EM weapons program. Either the contact(s) do not know of that program and those weapons and the work involved, or those who do know something of it do not dare to even breathe it.
And this is part of the problem. Several nations have indeed weaponized the basic higher symmetry electrodynamics, some to a very high degree, while this nation continues to plod along and utilize a hoary old 137-year old classical EM theory.  Some of these weapons are far more powerful than nuclear weapons; indeed, every  nuclear weapon on the planet, along with every nuclear powerplant, every nuclear propulsion system, etc. can be dudded in about 10 minutes by one class of these weapons -- thereby denuding most of the strategic armament of many nations (those who do not have the higher group symmetry EM weapons).  China and the KGB in Russia, e.g., have such weapons.  So do three other nations, one being Brazil.
Anyway, the entire area is thus very difficult to get any additional
information on.  Or open source funding in.  That is heartbreaking, since it
really is a marvelous new medical treatment modality, which could and would almost immediately save untold millions of human lives worldwide.
I personally do not think it can be done unless a single very wealthy patron
wishes it done and finances it personally.  We're talking about a 40 to 50
million dollar program, and 3 years of very intensive effort -- a mini
Manhattan Project, so to speak. Even then, the scientists on the project
must be carefully selected, else in their dedication to U(1) electrodynamics
they will become part of the problem rather than part of the solution.  As
another aside, biochemistry can be totally revolutionized, when one treats
the electrochemical system (in 3-space, with the usual assumption of a flat
spacetime and no net vacuum interaction) together with the active local
vacuum and its dynamics, and the active local curvatures of spacetime and
their dynamics, as a "supersystem".  No system analysis is complete unless a supersystem analysis has been performed.  Presently none are.  But you can form "impossible" molecules, ions, etc. which would normally be so unstable they would disappear in a nanosecond.  Yet if the interactions upon the system component from the vacuum and from the local curvatures of spacetime are equal and opposite, one "locks-in" a totally new equilibrium condition.  So one can engineer the vacuum and the curvatures of spacetime to do that for a desired "impossible" molecule or ion, and stabilize it into equilibrium in that normally terribly unstable state.  And that is a totally new biochemistry, waiting to be born.  But no one in the NAS, NSF, NIH, or universities is even interested in such things.  Pity.  The Russians alone have weaponized such for more than 50 years.
The earlier longitudinal EM wave interferometry weapons are what then
Secretary of Defense Cohen was referring to in 1997 when he made this
statement:  "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of
terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."  Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.  Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.

In my opinion, the only way the government (including NIH, NAS, NSF, etc.) will ever fund such work as the Priore development or the extended concept development  is after a major WMD strike is made on one or more of our cities, and we have a million or two Americans lying dead in the streets that the U.S. medical community cannot save.  If several cities are hit, it will be more.  If smallpox is unleashed again (and it is going to be unleashed; not if but when) it will eventually kill about one-third the human population.

Sadly, that is likely to happen, and the probability grows day by day.
We went to DoD, NIH, CDC, the USAF, and lots of others in 1998 with a formal suggestion that they develop a small portable machine to do the dramatically extended method, so that a majority of those future casualties could be saved.  Say, two minutes treatment per patient, followed by two more 2-minute treatments, one week apart.  They had not the slightest notion of what I was talking about!  At NIH, I never got out of the "policy" section (read: spin control).  No one read a single reference paper.  Not a single scientist called me to discuss it or how it worked, etc.
So we are now trying the private patent route, since the extended mechanism is my own discovery (after about 18 years work).  I don't have very much expectations, however, until AFTER that coming attack happens and a million or two Americans die.

Anyway, I wish you well in your own efforts to try to call attention to the Priore work and get it replicated.

Meanwhile, the O(3) electrodynamics work spearheaded by Dr. Myron Evans proceeds apace, and papers are now being published in leading Journals regularly.  We have just had three more such papers accepted for publication in Foundations of Physics Letters, for Dec. 2001. So the work does proceed, and the necessary higher group symmetry electrodynamics foundations is steadily being laid down.

Since my associates and I also have a successful COP;1.0 laboratory experiment (motionless electromagnetic generator -- MEG) that works by higher symmetry electrodynamics (and can only be understood by supersystem analysis), our plan is to proceed with that project (which will take another year of research before we place it on the market). We have placed the MEG in the National Materials Science Laboratory of the National Academy of Sciences in a friendly foreign nation, under a joint agreement.  They will complete the research to produce the commercial units,  which will be placed on the world market from that country.  The reason:  Same thing as for the Priore work exists in this country.  Most of our entire scientific community seems to be asleep as to what has been discovered in particle physics that dramatically affects electrodynamics.  Not a single university in the nation even teaches -- or knows -- what really powers every electromagnetic circuit or system -- even though the basis for knowing it was the discovery of broken symmetry by Lee and Yang and the award of the Nobel Prize in 1957. In short, we have a crisis in the scientific community in this nation, who now defend models against replicable experiments.  Hence --- particularly in weaponry -- we are no longer the most powerful nation, and in fact on several occasions since Jan. 1997 this nation has been saved from strategic destruction, and saved by a friendly little foreign nation.

If we succeed in our MEG  effort, then we ourselves will come into the necessary funding to fund the medical development work ourselves.  And we will do so, with alacrity.

Just now, unless some single wealthy patron comes forth with the desire to do it, I see no other way to get it done.

Nonetheless, I wish you well in your own endeavors, and I do hope you have success.

Best wishes,

Tom Bearden

From: Richard G
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:14 AM


Did you ever get the engineering schematics for Priore's "Super Machine?" Andre Staropoli (Deputy Director) and Dr. Algrain (Director of Research for the Defense Ministry) have both been trying to get these for me for the past four months with no luck. Dealing with the French is tantamount to squeezing water from a stone. It's no fun. My colleagues and I are stuck until we can see via schematics what Priore actually did. (The information in the small machine patent is useless, as I suspect Priore intended it to be.) We will try to build something under the auspices of a university and private donations IF we can get documentation that approaches a real "blue print." None of us have the time or money to spend 26 years trying to replicate what Priore did. We will have to get some help from some quarter. Scinece is built on the shoulders of others.

I hope to hear from you and wish you well.



To: "Richard G" 
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:10:48 -0600 ; ;

Dear Richard,  

I don't know what the 17 frequencies were.  You can see if the two U.S. patents by Priore have anything on them.  Or his French patents.  Mostly my "files" are "piles" in a 1230 square foot office, piled high in all directions.  So I'm trying to see if I have that government report or not. Will just have to poke around as I get the chance.  Still very limited as to how much I can do in any one day.  

Best wishes,  

Tom Bearden  

From: Richard G 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:38 PM 


The 17 frequencies which Priore placed on the 9.4 GHz carrier are needed. If you have ever come across these in your research, please let me know. My home phone  (evenings are best) is ******.  Many thanks for your help to date.  If you have the original or translated French government physicist's report on the "Super Machine," please send this to me at: Richard G

Thanks again.  -


From: "Tom Bearden" 
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 20:34:10 -0600    

Dear Dr. G****,    

I don't know offhand, but it may be in his two patents or in one of the  references below.  These are some of the references of possible interest  the frequencies may well be in the last report, which was an analysis of  the  electromagnetics.    

Best wishes,    

Tom Bearden