|Subject: RE: Crop Dusters
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:54:05 -0500
it does, but the prediction of such strikes was really not original
with me at all. I was
merely repeating the standard, known, accepted, unclassified
"threat" that our government has long recognized and stamped
its seal of approval upon. But
instead of implying it "may be 50 years in the future", I
simply stated it would occur much sooner, as was obvious to anyone
even vaguely following the march of terrorism and terrorist-backing
nations. The notion that
the attack will come fairly soon did not take a rocket scientist to
figure out either. In
standard intelligence threat work, one must always clearly
differentiate between capability
of the hostile forces and one's (perhaps erroneous) perceived intent
of the hostile forces. Americans
(including our own intelligence community personnel) often confuse the
two, and also often project American psychology onto the hostile
forces who may have a vastly different psychology.
Let me illustrate:
of my best friends and extremely close colleagues in all this, is a
retired Lieutenant Colonel whose U.S. Army career was spent in the
Corps of Engineers. In
Vietnam, he was commander of an Engineer construction battalion which
was building roads, bridges, etc. since there were very few such in
South Vietnam, and they were sorely needed so we could move equipment,
supplies, and paraphernalia around.
quite awhile his battalion was building roads and bridges right in the
midst of a region containing three North Vietnamese (NVA) and VC (Viet
Cong) divisions, each about 10,000 men strong.
So his small battalion was working right in the middle of
30,000 hostiles, all around his bulldozers, dump trucks, concrete and
asphalt machines, etc.
an American force of 3 divisions, with an enemy audacious enough to
come right into their territory and construct bridges and roads, would
have immediately attacked those completely vulnerable heavy equipment
machines and their operators, and the laborers, etc. and killed the
engineers and destroyed the equipment.
You know, get the enemy and his equipment, and all that.
That is in our very genes, and it is part of our "national
style" (one of the elements of a standard military strategic
was not the NVA and VC philosophy or psychology!
And it is not necessarily their "national style".
To them, they would inevitably win the war, and that battalion
was not doing anything to enhance U.S. combat positions, etc.
To them, they would need those roads and bridges after the
Americans were gone and South Vietnam fell to them. In other words, in
their odd outlook, my friend and his battalion were essentially
working for them, in a very strange sort of way.
my friend and his battalion were the safest men in all Vietnam!
Their physical security was provided by 30,000 well-armed
hostile NVA and VC personnel. Nobody
but nobody was going to be allowed to attack that battalion and its
equipment, or interfere with it.
friend had great difficulty in making this point to the "higher
up" commanders, and to new replacements reporting for duty.
Finally with his battalion being pressed and needing to get
things done much faster, he even began working the battalion at night
as well, with brilliant lights etc. -- right there in the middle of
three enemy divisions. His
battalion and men were the most vulnerable and most exposed men in all
Vietnam. And his men were
still the safest men in
made perfectly good sense to the NVA and VC.
It made no sense at all to the entire U.S. Army command.
very different psychology (and national style) of the adversary must
always be taken into account. For
that reason, we must never "project" our national American
psychology and "national style" upon other peoples.
They do not necessarily react the same way as we do.
real intelligence, to do it correctly one must first clearly state the
capability of the
hostile forces, completely devoid of any and all
"psychology" and "style" -- i.e., intent.
That tells you, to the best of your knowledge, what
the adversary can do.
The best threat projection is then based on that known
capability, and provides, say, several different potential
threat scenarios, showing the range of attacks he can
perform. In other words,
you show capability only, not some fool's self-appointed tea-leaves
divining of "what the enemy is intending
to do". Sometimes,
using other intelligence criteria,
an overall threat will also include a "projection",
where hostile intent is considered as best able. Often, however, the
intelligence community develops "positions" that are highly
political, and in many cases this "political position" will
override all other evidence or criteria.
An example favorite phrase usually revealing such a political
position is that "We have no evidence thatů" which is
often a blatant lie. I've
been there, worked on two National Intelligence Estimates, and watched
the process at work. To
translate the gobbledygook, whenever one sees that phrase or similar,
one translates it as "We have not looked at the evidence one way
or another," or "We do not choose to consider that."
the basic threat and its projection is formed, then combat
intelligence takes over, at the three levels of Strategic (national
level), Operational (Corp and Army level), and Tactical (Division and
lower level). What combat
intelligence does is continuously gather "incidents",
reports, statements, intercepts, and any and all other available
information pieces, that are indicative of certain combat
preparations, etc. E.g.,
massing forces in forward assembly areas, massing artillery forward,
etc. are indicators of preparations for attack.
respect to our regular knowledge of forces, preparations, etc. our
intelligence fellows do a very good job of looking at the
"standard indicators". So no one can fault them on that part
of their job, because there are many "normal" threats that
fall well-within that purview, and they really do a good job on that
area. There are many fine
people in intelligence, who work very hard and are dedicated
Americans. But as with
any large organization or group, there is a bell-shaped distribution
curve and a few are conniving, manipulative, and have little if any
that is a trait of any large human group, and it is certainly not
confined to the intelligence community alone.
But just as elsewhere, there is a small fraction which is doing
everything to shape and twist and "scamper up the career
ladder", etc. Just
as in any other large organization.
so, in the past (and presently also), I have been very critical of our
intelligence community overall because it was and is failing in the
capabilities analysis area in most "superscience" areas.
They still are. Specifically,
they have very little knowledge of the capabilities of higher
symmetry electrodynamics, since they almost
ubiquitously use standard
electrical engineers and engineering for analysis.
The problem is that this standard type of analyst -- however
capable in the orthodox sense -- is
totally incapable of even recognizing
the indicators pointing to a higher symmetry EM weapon or
also cannot just leave the blame with the intelligence community,
because in all fairness they must turn to the U.S. scientific
community for advanced scientific advice.
So the blame has to be shifted to the U.S. scientific community
itself. Here again, we
find the 136-year-old classical Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz
electrodynamics being dogmatically held and almost universally taught
in all our universities. The
entire U.S. scientific community, e.g., failed to recognize the
mechanism used in the decades-long "microwave radiation" of
the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. Excellent
ordinary electrodynamics analysis
by Johns Hopkins scientists showed clearly that the health changes in
personnel only occurred in field-free regions (i.e., in regions where
the changes in the potentials were zero).
In short, the diseases and health changes all occurred where
the potentials from the radiation were stable and "fixed" or
"electrostatic" or "magnetostatic".
So their conclusion that it could not have been the radiation
causing these changes, was a total non sequitur.
scientist -- purely from the nature of statistical inference -- could
see that, if the radiation were not involved, some of the changes
would have occurred in field-free regions and some would have occurred
in regions where the fields were present. This
is not what happened at all, for decades!
Since the effects were confined to only one single part
of the electrodynamic radiation, a priori that part must be the cause.
So the data proved conclusively that it was indeed the
radiation that was responsible, and it
was the stable
potentials themselves that were doing it..
No one connected this with Whittaker's 1903 and 1904 work
decomposing (when applied in combination) all potentials into
a harmonic longitudinal EM phase conjugate biwave structure.
So we totally missed the infolded, internal longitudinal EM
wave dynamics that comprises and creates all the "normal" EM
potentials, fields, and waves anyway.
also missed the fact that this internal LW EM dynamics constitutes an
infolded set of spacetime curvatures and their dynamics -- spacetime
curvature engines, e.g., or "vacuum engines" in particle
physics terms, or just "engines" for short.
as is well-known in general relativity, such an engine directly
interacts with, affects, and changes any matter exposed to it.
It follows straightaway that any kind of physical state and its
dynamics has an associates "engine" and its dynamics.
It also follows that, if you introduce a specific "delta
engine" for a specific change to that mass (whether living or
inert), the mass can and will be affected and changed specifically.
In short, one can engineer the interior electrodynamics of that
static scalar potential, or the fixed magnetic vector potential, or
both, to induce any sort of disease and health changes desired, in the
exposed human bodies. That's the overview, we also have some specifics
we are presently holding close.
purpose of that long Russian microwave radiation of the personnel in
the U.S. Embassy was to hit a high level target, thereby engaging the
attention of the U.S. government and scientific communities at the
highest level. Then sit
back and watch what response(s) is/are made at the Embassy.
We showed them responses based on classical EM theory alone,
thus confirming with 100% certainty that we did not recognize the
weapon used, we had no knowledge of the interior electrodynamics being
engineered to provide and EM-engineerable unified field theory, and
thus we had not developed defenses against such weapons.
This radiation was responsible for the deaths of three U.S.
ambassadors, and it generated health changes in numerous U.S.
personnel in the Embassy. Eventually
we declared that Embassy a "hazardous duty post" and
provided extra pay differential to persons serving therein.
the entire affair, for decades, was a total failure of both the U.S.
scientific community and the U.S. intelligence community (the latter
being depending upon the former for "expert" advice).
one tried to inform either the intelligence or scientific community of
what it really was, or speak of such things as "longitudinal EM
wavesets comprising all EM potentials, fields, and waves, can be
altered to make vacuum engines (spacetime curvature engines) when the
internal EM structure and dynamics are changed", one was called
misguided and na´ve at best and a lunatic at worst.
Yet this had been in the scientific literature for more than
half a century. Indeed,
classical electrodynamics (e.g., as used in electrical engineering)
assumes a flat local spacetime (falsified by general relativity for
nearly a century) and an inert vacuum (falsified by particle physics
for half a century or more). So
our own scientific community revealed that it itself did not and was
determined not to understand and use science already in the literature
and already experimentally proven.
Our scientific community still is doing precisely the same
thing, and has hardly changed an iota.
Worse, the scientific community has a knee-jerk reaction and
demonstrated habit of destroying the careers of those brave scientists
who venture "out of the prescribed standard box".
A perfect example is the pounding, slander, libel, etc. that
the founders of ultrawideband radar took.
At the time that the scientific pundits were smugly proclaiming
the worthlessness of their attempts to found this new radar
technology, one could already purchase off-the-shelf a small model of
an UWB radar, used for detecting voids in materials, concrete, etc.
we are now more than 50 years behind the extended electrodynamics
technology of some of our foes. We
are beginning to get a little bit knowledgeable, but have very far yet
to go. And frankly, the
U.S. scientific community is not and will not help at all, or so it
seems. They are in fact
part of the problem rather than part of the solution, bent on
"defending and applying the status quo".
We are definitely Romans and not Greeks, as a humorous example.
a single university in the United States even teaches what actually
powers an electrical circuit, even though that has been in physics for
more than 40 years, with Nobel prize awarded to Lee and Yang.
Unless someone really squeezes our scientific leaders, then 40
years from now the correct "powering of an electric circuit"
will still not be in the
curricula of electrical engineering at any American university.
There is absolutely no justification for such scientific
conduct (or misconduct, more accurately).
It is not science, but dogma, to continue to ignore that which
is already long since experimentally proven and easily demonstrated in
any university lab. And
to continue to ignore it for a half century.
this horrendous failure of the scientific community has been
responsible for the direct impressing of a scientific dogma, ancient
and decrepit, upon our intelligence community.
That must be clearly recognized.
Simply look at the web sites of the National Science Foundation
(government organization) and the National Academy of Sciences
(private Organization, constitutionally prescribed to advise the
Government on science matters) and you will see no funded work in
extracting EM energy from the vacuum, even though every circuit,
generator, and battery ever built and built today does precisely that.
You will see a total failure to attack the energy crisis right
where it begins: by what actually powers the circuit.
You will see no acceptance of cold fusion, now demonstrated in
more than 600 successful experiments worldwide, in several nations and
many laboratories, by perhaps 200 scientists from those countries,
labs, or independently. For
the electric circuit, any dipolarity, being opposite charges, a priori
extracts EM energy from the vacuum in unusable form ( the input must
be from the time-domain; it is easily demonstrated experimentally that
no observable EM energy is input in 3-space), transduces it into
usable form, and pours it out in all directions.
Once a generator or dipole expends some of its input or
available energy to force its internal charges apart and form that
dipole, then the well-known proven asymmetry of that "source
dipole" in the local vacuum energy flux already tells us that the
dipole/dipolarity extracts EM energy from the vacuum and pours it out
the terminals. Particle
physics says so. Experimentally
and theoretically. And
the Nobel Committee said so, by awarding the Nobel prize to Lee and
Yang in 1957. That is 44
years ago, and the electrical engineers still do not know it.
should not have to reprove over and over what has already been proven
in science and a Nobel Prize awarded for the discovery!
it appears that our NSF and NAS simply will not read the scientific
literature and see that. Consequently,
billions of dollars are being spent in energy research on everything
except the real problem: how to master and correctly use the broken
symmetry of the ubiquitous dipole.
and NAS apparently deem any and all such research -- which could free
us from oil very quickly, give us all the electrical energy we need,
from the vacuum and cleanly -- as suspicious at best and worthless at
worth. One is not
permitted even to seriously raise the question that, considering the
proven broken symmetry of the dipole and that vacuum energy extracted
by that dipole actually powers the external circuit, then what
characteristic of the standard electrical circuit and power system is
responsible for destroying the otherwise continuous and sustained EM
energy flow from the vacuum into any dipole, and out of that dipole
into surrounding 3-space?
new war we have just entered will be long, costly, and it also will
likely result in a great number of American casualties I our cities
and casualties in the cities of other nations.
It could easily (and will almost certainly do so, sooner or
later) disrupt the flow of MidEast Oil.
In that case, even though the price of oil fell today, e.g.,
due to the reduced travel worldwide being a dramatic reduction in the
demand for oil, a new and critical oil shortage could come upon us
suddenly at any time that serious strikes are made on those MidEast
oil fields, pipelines, refineries, etc.
We have far too little refining capability here in the U.S.
As an example, when President Clinton ordered some oil from the
national reserves to be used to alleviate the former oil crisis, the
oil had to be shipped overseas to be refined into gasoline, because
there was insufficient refining capacity here in the U.S. to do it!
above "looming oil crisis" is just one example of a coming
strategic problem whose responsibility lies directly at the feet of
the leaders of the U.S. scientific community.
We could long since have been free from all foreign oil, had
they funded the
correction and modernizing of the
terribly flawed classical EM theory they so stoutly enforce.
It should have been done as a matter of the highest national
priority. It wasn't, and
it does not appear that it will be done anytime in the foreseeable
future. It is so bad that, for our own MEG (a successful laboratory
COP>1.0 EM power system experiment), we had to turn to a friendly
foreign country, to its National Materials Science Laboratory (which
is part of its National Academy of Sciences), to find scientists
already well-versed in higher symmetry electrodynamics and its use,
willing to perform the final year of research needed to develop the
unit for the commercial market and full production. That is now
fearsome weapons indeed (a little information is on my website; there
is far, far more that I do not have on there!) have been produced by
several hostile nations, deployed, tested, and utilized.
We are so far behind that we no longer really control our own
strategic survival (without further discussion of that).
Instead, there are two other nations -- one in particular,
which has repeatedly saved our bacon since Jan. 1997 -- which have
been holding the real strategic tigers at bay.
am speaking of hostile capability,
not hostile intent.
The KGB, e.g. has not changed its stripes at all, even though
Putin himself may not be a full part of it.
The real power in Russia is the KGB and Russian mafia, which is
used as an arm of the KGB. Simply
listen to Lunev for confirmation of that latter fact.
The "superweapons" I obliquely refer to are all under
the direct control (including research, development, production,
deployment, manning, and employment) of the KGB; they have never been
in the regular Russian armed forces themselves.
Japanese Mafia (Yakuza) and Aum Shinrikyo also have gained possession
of earlier longitudinal EM wave interferometer weapons, and are now
able to build such in their own facilities in Japan.
They continue to directly operate many of this class of weapons
on site in Russia.
is a publicly confirmed fact now that Russia (read: the KGB) has long
had a plan, after any initial nuclear (or superweapon) exchange, to
completely annihilate the rest of the surviving U.S. populace by
biological warfare strikes etc. That has not changed.
also has recently deployed some fearsome weapons indeed, very quietly.
When the recent 2-carrier U.S. naval task force recently
maneuvered in the South China Sea, one of these frightful weapons --
capable of destroying that task force in minutes -- was quietly
trained upon them. China
has declared the South China Sea its territorial waters (more than 60%
of the oil to Japan passes through there, for example).
China has also recently conducted invasion practice on an
island close to Taiwan, and continues to iterate that Taiwan belongs
to China and will be forcibly repatriated.
China controls both ends of the Panama canal, and has
entry-port facilities now on both the U.S. West Coast and Southern
Coast, as well as in Central and South America.
foreign nations have long inserted terrorist teams, commando teams,
agents, etc. into our open nation, for some decades.
They are here, they have some nuclear weapons here, and they
have other weapons of mass destruction in hand such as anthrax,
smallpox, bubonic plague, etc.
my personal view, the first phase of any strategic war is to deliver
the strategic weapons onto their distant targets. In that view, the
first phase of WW III has already been completed.
behind the scenes, this present war is very complex and has several
"layers", not just terrorism.
One major characteristic of the national style of Russia can
best be characterized as "they have always been the master chess
players of the world", and "they look many moves (and many
years) ahead, plan multiple moves of the various chess pieces in
play," etc. So
we indeed have the international terrorist groups, many backed by
foreign nations hostile to the U.S.
Behind that, we also have other groups and nations that are
clandestinely maneuvering and pulling the strings, using the tiers
below (the terrorist organizations and their sponsoring hostile
nations) as pieces on the overall chessboard.
Bush was quite correct when he pointed out that this new war is a war
of all free nations against those who would totally overthrow their
freedom and intend to do so. It
is going to be fought all over the globe, with multiple level
maneuvers and pieces moved on the chessboard.
At the highest levels, there is also maneuvering to be able to
unleash the superweapons, once the "other side" is
sufficiently hampered, damaged, or restrained.
Some "unleashing" has already been clandestinely
accomplished, such as "spreading" the immune systems.
We have previously explained that technique, and about two
years ago the indicators of its use occurred, right here in the U.S.
(This will not be discussed further at this time).
The effect of "spreading" the immune system to force
(trick) it to prepare for
a whole cocktail of diseases -- say, 20 or more.
This "spread-out preparation" uses all the immune
systems' finite sources, causes it to dilute those resources across
all these "shadow diseases" present in the body that it is
reacting to, but not yet present as overt disease (the immune system
reacts to quantum mechanical "ghost forms" at the upper
level of the virtual state) .
result of immune system spreading of the targeted U.S. populace is
that, when a terrorist biological warfare strike occurs on a major
U.S. city (or on several), the casualties from that terrorist strike
are multiplied by a factor from 3 to 5, as compared to the same strike
upon a populace with normal unspread immune systems.
The OTA study for Congress a few years ago showed that a single
professional terrorist strike with anthrax spray, from a small light
plane puttering around over Washington, D.C. on a calm night, would
yield some 1 to 3 million casualties.
Now up that by a factor of 3, include strikes against five U.S.
cities, and one can see what can be done clandestinely at the
"new weapons" level. There
are three nations having that weapon, and neither is the U.S.
However, a fourth nation -- China -- now has it or is just
point is that these types of effects from developing higher symmetry
EM technology have been totally ignored by our scientific community,
hence largely ignored by our government and intel communities because
the scientific community disposes of that fact (the spreading of the
immune system) in quite
an off-hand and callous manner.
we desperately need is for NSF, NAS, NAE, and the various great U.S.
scientific organizations -- as well as the universities -- to be
galvanized into a crash national effort under a Presidential Decision
Directive to rapidly develop higher symmetry electrodynamics,
including both the theoretical models and the technologies that
result. And to apply this
higher symmetry EM into every technology area.
As rapidly as it can humanly be accomplished.
Much like the Manhattan Project in WW II.
another of the characteristics in our "national style" is
that, if it is not invented here, it has to be inferior because U.S.
science is the best in the world, and already "knows everything
there is to know".
greatest vulnerability we have in this new war we have just entered
after being so viciously attacked, is precisely the "existing and
feeding" of that rather smug national characteristic in our
check the history of science, and one will readily find a hundred
cases where the prevailing scientific community fiercely resisted new
discoveries in science, even by leading scientists, and savaged the
scientists unmercifully who had dared "upset the applecart".
Any historian of science can rattle off a very long list, and
there are even books devoted to exposing that.
the end of WW II, since we had gained the atomic bomb first, Stalin
bypassed the "resistance of science to innovation" problem
very simply: He simply
called in the leaders of his Academy of Sciences and demanded the next
great technical breakthrough (after the U.S. dropped the atomic bomb)
as quickly as it could be humanly done.
And he held them personally accountable to him, to continually
report progress. He was of course an absolute dictator, who did not
hesitate to kill his enemies or those who opposed his wishes.
No progress, off with the scientific head, or off to Siberia to
work to death in the political prison camps. (Suppose you suddenly
held all the heads of all the nuclear science agencies in the U.S.
along with the NAS and NSF, the responsibility -- on pain of execution
for failure or lagging -- of rapidly explaining and developing cold
fusion. Try to
imagine how quickly that would come into fruition as a new science,
new theory, and new technology.)
Russians have always been the greatest nonlinear scientists in the
world, since day one. Check
it out. They still are.
So suddenly the Russian scientific hierarchy -- at the very top
-- was desperate for something -- anything
-- to report as progress back to Stalin.
In short, they got their own boots off the necks of those
superb nonlinear Russian scientists and mathematicians, and did just
the opposite: they pleaded and urged them for any developments,
experiments, theories, ideas, etc. that could show progress to hold
off Stalin's cold and lethal wrath.
They set up great institutes (one had 2,000 Ph.D.s and their
support groups) to examine the entire scientific literature of the
West, paper by paper, since day one.
Nothing like that has ever been even contemplated in the West.
Anything really interesting that had not been followed up
got laid aside for perusal and close examination by the "superscientists".
Little wonder that they quickly discovered and began developing
at high speed the internal infolded longitudinal EM wave
electrodynamics comprising all the "normal" stuff.
Interestingly, in the West Whittaker's 1904 paper initiated
superpotential theory, but his 1903 paper and its representing a more
fundamental infolded electrodynamics -- and thus a unified field
theory -- was missed. It
was not missed by those Russian superscientists, spurred on by the
desperate leaders of the Soviet Academy of Sciences.
1950, prototype higher symmetry EM weapons were already being made and
tested, often at sea and at night (and the sightings of these tests
being reported quite frequently in the 50s and 60s in the open
literature, by passing ships' captains).
Other tests on land were also observed and openly published
without any understanding of what they were.
the former Soviet Union began intensive development of these advanced
technologies and weapons, in full hue but without open cry, by 1950.
By 1960, China was also full-tilt in developing them.
is not that we could not have done it.
It is that the U.S. scientific community was the problem and
continued to be the problem, and it savaged its own members who could
have broken us out of the mold. That
problem -- of the scientific community itself being the greatest enemy
of real scientific "out-of-the-box" innovation -- has been
our greatest vulnerability, and it now threatens the survival of the
United States and the Western world.
We simply must find a way for force the scientific community to
get back to science, as already demonstrated by experiment, and rid
themselves of enforcing the status quo of a decrepit old classical EM
theory put together 137 years ago, and then twice reduced to even a
small subset of Maxwell's 1865 theory.
the West, most of that small band of theoreticians and
experimentalists trying to modernize and update the old classical
electrodynamics are still savaged unmercifully, and often destroyed.
Yet astounding breakthroughs -- including for the good of all
human beings on this planet -- readily come from such work, in energy,
healing, propulsion, you name it.
The mastery of the "inner infolded electromagnetics"
inside all the normal EM potentials, fields and waves is actually a
unified field theory, but one directly engineerable on the lab bench.
It largely fits the Sachs unified field theory --- the most
perfect expression of electrodynamics seems to be Sachs'
electrodynamics, e.g., and O(3) has been shown to be an important
subset. Higher symmetry
EM can be expressed in
quaternions, e.g., or various other already available algebras, and
much of it can be expressed in a variety of higher group symmetry
electrodynamics models such as SU(2)XSU(2), O(3), etc. (there are
many). Some of
these new and advanced types of electrodynamics have already been at
least partially developed and used for special purposes in particle
physics, and are fitted to and justified by experiment.
thanks for your favorable comments and interest.
As best we can in spite of the continued hypoxia, we are
desperately trying to put together a package again, very much updated,
to show that a small, portable higher group symmetry electrodynamic
medical treatment device can be rapidly developed in a crash program
of from $60-100 million. The
device could treat (radiate in very special fashion) a casualty in
about 2 minutes flat, and another, and another, etc.
After development costs are paid, the units could be
mass-produced for something like $70-100 thousand each.
They could be produced in quantity and "flooded down"
through fire stations, hospitals and clinics, police stations,
emergency response teams and crews, etc.
A high school student could be trained to effectively use such
a machine (which would be laptop computer controlled) in 30 minutes.
But as you can understand, the medical community itself and the
entire pharmaceutical community, not to mention the scientific
community, would be and is adamantly opposed to any such
"monstrous idea" from the getgo.
After all, the machine uses and highly amplifies the actual
mechanism used in the body to heal itself (the cellular regeneration
system, poorly understood and mostly studied by Becker and a few
others). The present
medical community essentially uses intervention techniques (which are
necessary, we are not knocking them!) but really has no "direct
healing" science or therapy at all.
Indeed, it has not yet deciphered the actual higher symmetry
mechanism used by the cellular regenerative system, which we finally
deciphered after 14 years intense work, and which is the precise
mechanism used in the device we are recommending be developed.
The fundamental experimental proof that the mechanism works was
already shown in France in the 1960s and early 70s, with experiments
conducted by eminent French scientists, and the results published in
the well-known French scientific literature.
This is not anecdotal material, but proven material long since
Bill Gates or Ted Turner, e.g., could easily fund the entire
development without missing the pocket change too much.
That is not going to happen either.
as a nation we shall soon most desperately need such treatment
systems, to save about 70% of those millions of American casualties
when the terrorists hit our cities and population centers with
anthrax, smallpox, bubonic plague, and such.
Just now, most of those casualties are going to perish.
We will continue
to do everything in our power to get this developed.
is my beloved country, and those casualties are my American friends
and neighbors. My own
children could well be among them, or the children of my neighbors and
friends. Therefore the
moral imperative is so great, to anyone with a conscience, that one
must continue to do anything one can, regardless of one's physical
state and lack of resources, to the limit of one's ability.
The job simply must get done, and it must get done in time, if
it is humanly possible to do it.
and best wishes,