The Tom Bearden





Energy from the Vacuum

"Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts & Principles"
Order Now!

Help support the research



Subject: RE: Biofuels: Last Chance to Support Our Campaign
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 16:57:49 -0500


Dear Christopher,


For God’s sake, if you really want to do something of value, please get off the “biofuels” regime. If you are totally attached to “fuels”, then for goodness sakes look into Dr. John Kanzius’ independently verified process to easily trick the water molecule into losing its O-H bond, so that the H-O-H water molecule just falls apart into H2 and O2 gases. This is done simply by “tickling” the local vacuum (in which the water is immersed) to have some negative energy – which is very easily and simply done. That negative energy with its associated negative probabilities is automatically applied to all the basic active vacuum interactions that (with positive energy) drive stronger grouped interactions statistically, then to higher groupings including electrons, quarks and then protons and neutrons, and thus to atoms and then to molecules. Positive vacuum energy drives the underlying fundamental statistical processes upward.


When we then tickle that same vacuum (including all those ongoing interactions that continually CREATE and MAINTAIN the O-H bond at the top (most energetic) level, so that negative vacuum energy with its NEGATIVE PROBABILITIES is introduced to those fundamental statistical interactions, you start reversing or “unhappening” the highest energy level thing first. That means that the H-O-H molecules now “fall apart” freely, because their O-H bond starts vanishing.


So in that region where you are “tickling” the vacuum with lots of little tiny RF pulses, suddenly you have H2 and O2 freely occurring, and in the exact mix needed for perfect combustion. In that region the mix isn’t explosive, because to explode it would have to reform those O-H bonds – and the increased negative probabilities make that very difficult.


Then if you just pipe the H2 and O2 gases outside that local “negative vacuum energy” region, say into the combustion chamber of an automobile engine, then the altered vacuum now has positive energy again in the combustion chamber. That means that, in this “normal again” region, the inserted H2 and O2 is no longer prohibited from forming the O-H bond. Hence it burns very, very nicely to form H-O-H water molecules, which come out in the form of water vapor emitted from the exhaust.


Dr. Kanzius’s process works well with SALT water, so you can use salt water from the inexhaustible oceans as your fuel – for autos, trucks, ships, diesel engines, etc. Save the salt and, say, at Niagara Falls etc., just add the salt back to normal water piped from the local river, and that gives you watergas fuel again. Or the process can be adjusted so little or no salt is needed anyway.


For God sakes, put a decent modern physicist on this problem to give you the background. Negative energy occurs normally in modern physics, in the Shrödinger equation and its relativistic extensions, in Dirac’s original electron theory, etc. But when this was uncovered in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the leading mathematical physicists such as Heisenberg, Pauli, and others were astonished and totally fear-stricken over the fact that one can directly engineer physical reality itself, if one masters not only positive vacuum energy but learns to tickle it to add negative energy with its negative probabilities.


So they viciously attacked any physicist defending the negative energy – which included Dirac, who for some time defended it because it also occurred in his own successful theory. Quoting Dirac:


“Negative energies and probabilities should not be considered as nonsense. They are well-defined concepts mathematically, like a negative of money." [P. A. M. Dirac, “The physical interpretation of quantum mechanics.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 180, 1942, pp. 1-40.]


The attacks against Dirac and any others defending negative energy were so vehement that begrudgingly Dirac was forced to help remove it from his own theory by “artifice”. Quoting him:


“I remember once when I was in Copenhagen, that Bohr asked me what I was working on and I told him I was trying to get a satisfactory relativistic theory of the electron, and Bohr said ‘But Klein and Gordon have already done that!’ That answer first rather disturbed me. Bohr seemed quite satisfied by Klein’s solution, but I was not because of the negative probabilities that it led to. I just kept on with it, worrying about getting a theory which would have only positive probabilities.” [Conversation between Dirac and J. Mehra, Mar. 28, 1969, quoted by Mehra in Aspects of Quantum Theory, ed. A. Salam and E. P. Wigner, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973.]


So in 1934, our own physicists ARBITRARILY AND DELIBERATELY discarded negative energy and negative probabilities from physics. For Hotson’s exposé on how negative energy was discarded from physics, see D. L. Hotson’s 2-part article listed just below. Quoting Hotson:


“I think if one had to point to a single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation.” [D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.]  Available at . The second part of the article is available at .


Note that Dr. Gene Mallove – who understood the significance of this arbitrary discard of negative energy – printed that article by Hotson in the little journal that he, Dr. Mallove, published.


Further, for goodness sakes have a PHYSICIST who also knows group theory explain to you the full impact of the direct and deliberate crippling of electrical engineering just as it was being born, by J. P. Morgan’s elicitation of Lorentz to “fix the problem” involved in these new Heaviside equations that were going to be used to establish the new “electrical engineering” to be taught in our universities. The problem was that Tesla had discovered asymmetric Maxwellian systems (they are plentifully present in Maxwell’s actual theory, which was never adopted or even generally taught in our universities), and he had also learned to use them to freely extract and use excess EM energy from the “active medium” (Tesla’s term for the active vacuum/spacetime). Tesla was hell-bent to give the world free energy (from these ASYMMETRIC circuits), and would have done so. Morgan set up the plan that destroyed Tesla later, and also destroyed Tesla’s backer, Westinghouse. With Westinghouse gone, Tesla then only had J. P. Morgan to turn to, to obtain funding for his intended project. The wily Morgan agreed to fund him, but required Tesla to sign over 51% of all his inventions – thus giving Morgan rigid control of Tesla’s work and progress. He also gave Tesla only half the minimum funding needed. When Tesla ran out, there was no more – and Tesla wound up living alone in a small hotel in New York, essentially off his charitable friends etc.


Here are some quotes from Tesla, showing in his own words what he had uncovered.


"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].


“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].


“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of AC generators at Niagara Falls.].


"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].


To see that Lorentz – although a great scientist – also had the neat little habit of taking other scientists’ work, using it, and taking credit for it, see J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Jackson and Okun discuss roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first. This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit for it.


So Morgan’s science advisors just elicited Lorentz to “fix” the problem of the asymmetry of Heaviside’s equations that would be used for the “new” electrical engineering being formed. Lorentz simply applied Lorenz’s symmetrization of those equations, and also took credit for it. For the actual dirty work, see H. A. Lorentz, "La Théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants," [The Electromagnetic Theory of Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch. Néerl. Sci., Vol. 25, 1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected Papers, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, vol. 2, pp. 168-238, esp. p. 168.] This is the work that Lorentz cites later (in 1895) for his proof of the symmetrical regauging theorems (the two equations of symmetrical regauging).


So just before the very birth of “electrical engineering”, the EE model was in fact severely limited by tossing out all remaining asymmetrical Maxwellian systems – the very kind of system permitted to accept and use excess free EM energy from the vacuum.


And they made sure that EEs are not taught group symmetry (which has been in our universities since 1870), so that they would never realize what had been done to them and why.


Here are the facts.  There is not now and there never has been an “energy crisis”. Instead, there is a “fuel” crisis if you insist on burning fuel to get the energy (often just heat to heat steam boilers) to break the symmetry in a motor or motor-generator. Once that symmetry of the magnetic fields is broken, then the RESULTING asymmetrical system is self-powering. For a permanent magnet motor, we use symmetrical permanent magnets (equal magnetic field strengths laterally left and right). When the rotor magnet pole is being drawn in to the stator magnet pole in the forward mmf region, that accelerates the shaft and the flywheel, which thus stores up free excess energy in the form of the increased angular momentum of the flywheel/shaft. That is FREE ENERGY from permanent magnet fields (a “static” field is just a continuous free flow of real observable photons, whose energy has been taken from the virtual state vacuum via the asymmetry of the dipole). But then as the rotor pole passes the stator pole, it is being “pulled back” the other way in the back mmf region. For a symmetric field magnet arrangement, that then decelerates the previously accelerated shaft and flywheel, taking back all the previous free energy that was transferred to shaft and flywheel.


So to break that symmetry between forward and back mmf fields, we usually add a coil in there, and pay the power company for some electric power to power the coil with appropriate timing, so that the temporary coil magnetic field that we pay for overpowers and overrides (in reverse) the back mmf field. That means that the TOTAL back mmf field (the mix of the two) is now much weaker (or even zero) compared to the forward mmf field. So the shaft and flywheel are not decelerated; therefore on every rotation the NOW-ASYMMETRIC magnetic fields are adding free flywheel and shaft rotational energy. We can thus add a drag load to the shaft, matched to the increase in energy obtained on each rotation, and that asymmetric system will SELF-ROTATE and self-power that load.


Note that the “power” we input has nothing at all to do with directly furnishing energy to the external circuit. All we pay for is to BREAK THE SYMMETRY in that system, with the proper timing.


Nature could care less whether we ourselves pay to break the symmetry, or whether we just use asymmetric magnets in the first place. Either way, the ASYMMETRY system is self-powering.


And that’s precisely why Morgan had Lorentz arbitrarily discard all the ASYMMETRIC Maxwellian systems from Heaviside’s already truncated but asymmetric equations – by simply symmetrizing the very equations the engineer is taught, so he will never be able to think, design, build, and deploy ASYMMETRIC systems except by then independently paying to break that system symmetry and erroneously thinking he is “powering the system”.


EEs, you see, have never even known what actually powers an EM system, and they still do not know what does it today.


To prove that Tesla had actually discovered asymmetric systems and thus could “move the energy in a circuit around” at will, dissipating it as he willed, see T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this. (Also note that Barrett was one of the cofounders of the ultrawideband radar, which was widely thought to be totally impossible by our conventional scientists at the time). Also note that Barrett’s use of the higher group symmetry quaternion electrodynamics is almost exactly Maxwell’s original theory – which was some 20 quaternion and quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns – and which WAS NEVER EVEN USED in university or electrical engineering.

Now please have a good physicist or higher group symmetry electrodynamicist check this out: It appears that our own Department of Energy has had asymmetric permanent magnets since at least 2001. This means that with such permanent magnets one can easily assemble self-powering permanent magnet motors and motor-generators, at will, as cheap as apple pie and in 15 minutes. Have a qualified scientist (NOT an electrical engineer!) simply check these three references below and give you his conclusions:

Vijay K. Chandhok and Bao-min Ma. “Method for producing a noncircular permanent magnet”.  United States Patent No. 4,915,891, issued April. 10,1990.
     Abstract: A method for producing a noncircular magnet having asymmetric magnetic properties along axes thereof. A particle charge of composition from which the magnet is to be produced is placed in a container, heated and extruded within the container to compact the particle charge to substantially full density. The particle charge may include at least one rare earth element. The particle charge may be extruded through a noncircular extrusion die, specifically a rectangular die.


Vijak K. Chandhok, WO/2001/084569 A1) “Method for Producing through Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”, International patent, 9 Mar. 2001.
     Note (quoting): “This invention was made with government support under a small business research and development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97-ER82313). The Government has certain rights to this invention.”
     Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically, by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the container and particle charge and extruding the container and particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a manner that one of the cross-sectional axes or dimension of the container and particle charge is held substantially constant during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the smallest cross-sectional dimension of the extruded magnet.


Vijak K. Chandhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No. 6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.
     Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically, by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the container and particle charge and extruding the container and particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a manner that one of the cross-sectional axes or dimension of the container and particle charge is held substantially constant during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the smallest cross-sectional dimension of the extruded magnet.


In other words, the work on asymmetric magnets would have had to produce and test assemblies of them – and that would have been self-powering permanent magnet ASYMMETRIC systems where one oneself does not have to continue to pay for input energy to break the system symmetry between forward and back mmf regions.


That strongly implies that the DoE has had self-powering “test” permanent magnet motors and motor-generators since 2001, and has withheld that information from the President, the Congress, the scientific community, and the American public.


Being a retired military officer, I regard that startling conclusion – if in fact it is true – as a case of the highest treason and damage to our nation that could be done.


Draw your own conclusion.


But please get off the biofuels, oil, and other junk.  Here’s how easy it is to evoke all the free EM energy flow you wish – anytime, anywhere, and cheap as peanuts.


Lay a permanent magnet (symmetrical fields) on the table. Now on top of it lay an electret (or, if you prefer, a charged capacitor), so that the E-field of the electrical component is orthogonal to the H-field of the magnet. Then according to every EE textbook in every EE department in every technical university on earth, that silly $10 gadget will just sit there and freely pour out a real Poynting EM energy flow “wind” S, given by the simple equation S = E X H. This is already certified by the standard Poynting energy flow part of every EM text.


And if you just leave that silly contraption alone, it will sit there till the end of time and freely pour out a real, usable, EM energy wind.


So we can easily get the free EM energy flow from the vacuum, which only requires dipolarity and nothing else (any dipole is a proven broken symmetry, as witness the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in 1957).


The only problem is, how do we go about building a “free EM energy windmill” to separately intercept some of that free EM energy wind, collect it, and then separately dissipate it in the loads to power them?


You see, the system required is an ASYMMETRIC system where the collecting and using “windmill” system does not connect to or tamper with the source (the source dipole) producing the free EM energy wind. But our electrical engineers from the very beginning have been constrained to only building SYMMETRICAL systems that (1) are connected to the source dipolarity providing the free EM energy flow from the seething vacuum, (2) take half their freely collected EM energy in the external circuit, and (3) use half the externally collected free energy to drive the external spent electrons back through the internal source dipole itself against the back EMF or MMF, and thus (4) “destroy” their own source dipolarity (and the resulting free flow of EM energy wind from the vacuum) faster than they can use some of the remaining half of the collected energy to power the loads.


That is the only “EM energy problem” we have ever had, and it is the only one we have now.


Please, please do modernize your understanding by going to some modern physicists and getting out of the paralysis of that stupid, archaic, horribly flawed electrical engineering!


Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden




From: Worldwatch Institute []
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 12:09 PM
Subject: Biofuels: Last Chance to Support Our Campaign


Worldwatch Logo




Dear Fellow Worldwatchers,

A heartfelt thanks to all of you who have already contributed to our Spring Biofuels Campaign! Your generosity will enable us to continue bringing fact-based research and analysis to the biofuels debate.

While we have made significant progress toward our goal, we still have $7,280 left to raise. A few generous board members have stepped forward to provide a matching gift of $3,500, so your donation will be matched dollar for dollar until we meet our goal. I hope it will inspire you to donate today!

It was recently revealed that firms backed by the Grocery Manufacturers Association have launched a smear campaign promoting the ills of the ethanol industry and painting an inaccurate picture of its effects on food and fuel prices.

With information coming out on both sides, and some groups intentionally working to confuse the issue further, it seems to be getting harder and harder to tell spin from truth. Isn't it worth supporting independent, critical, and balanced research on biofuels?

The Worldwatch Institute is the leading nongovernmental environmental research organization. By producing solid, fact-based information that connects environmental science with the world's most pressing issues (energy, food, water, security, health), Worldwatch stands alone in speaking to a global audience.

Your donation will support opinion pieces, web outreach, and our upcoming report Sustainable Biofuels in the U.S., which will bring the following recommendations to policymakers:

·         Embrace cleaner, more climate-friendly transport fuels through fiscal policies that steer the country toward low-carbon biofuels.

·         Reform outdated agricultural policies in favor of policies that support environmentally sustainable agricultural practices and the protection of vulnerable landscapes.

·         Push for a broader clean energy and climate strategy that leads to sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions by making transportation more efficient.

Worldwatch is committed to lending its independent, credible voice to the biofuels debate, but we need your help. Thanks to our generous board members, your gift will have twice the impact.

I hope you will make a gift today.

With gratitude,

Christopher Flavin