The Tom Bearden





Energy from the Vacuum

"Energy from the Vacuum - Concepts & Principles"
Order Now!

Help support the research



From: Tom Bearden
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Professor “X”
Subject: How to quickly solve the world energy crisischeaply and cleanly.

(slightly modified to protect the correspondent’s name and organization, etc.)

Dear Dr. X:

Your hard work to try to do something definitive about the energy crisis is very much appreciated.

I would like to give you some very different information on the energy crisis, what has caused it, and how to very quickly resolve it permanently and cleanly – and cheaply. This is not the standard pabulum you have heard from most academics, our scientific community, and official sources such as the U.S. Department of Energy. It specifically is not in the “total piece of normal stuff but politically well-stated” report given to President George Bush by his science advisors in 2006. But it’s factual and you can check the information rigorously.

Indeed, that Presidential Scientific advisory panel in 2006 still did not understand what actually powers an electrical circuit, even though the knowledge has been available since the revolutionary broken symmetry discovery (predicted by Lee and Yang) that so revolutionized physics – so much so that, when Wu and her colleagues experimentally proved it in Feb. 1957, the Nobel Committee acted with unprecedented speed and awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang the very same year, in Dec. 1957.

But in the 50 years since then, the ramifications of this revolutionary discovery in physics has not made it across the university campus from the physics department to the electrical engineering department. Physicists usually do not wish to become involved in electrical power efforts or studies; they take the attitude that, for that crude stuff, go talk to the electrical engineering department and professors. Meanwhile, they – the physicists – are working on a new accelerator 20 miles in diameter. Going to bang those particles together at higher velocities, getting them to break into new kinds of particles and thereby get some “new physics”.

And electrical engineering was “frozen” and “fixed” in 1892, before the dawn of modern physics. It has not changed its basic model since then, even though eminent scientists point out that the EE model actually contains numerous falsities, things that have been proven to be false by modern physics, after that hoary old EE model was already glued together containing those very same falsities.

So how could the scientists realize such things as whether or not a given model included EM systems permitted to take their input energy directly from the active medium (in today’s language, from the active vacuum/spacetime) – way back in the 1890s before the advent of most of modern physics?

Well, it’s a question that a group theory analysis of the model’s equations can readily answer.

Recall that we have had group theory in our universities since 1870, yet – strangely – the electrical engineers have essentially no training in it, and therefore no familiarity with it. That too is for a reason: In the 1890s, some very powerful folks did not wish the future electrical engineers to ever become aware of what had been deliberately done to them to savagely curtail their model and therefore their future technology – such as electrical power – by deliberately tossing out all “electric windmill” type systems taking their energy from EM winds freely and easily evoked directly from the local seething vacuum/spacetime.

In other words, by tossing out all remaining asymmetric Maxwellian systems, leaving behind only symmetrical systems.

I will first ask one very precise question, which has a very precise answer, and with it you can see if your own technical staff has any inkling of what has been asked. I will bet in advance they will not have any notion, and most will not believe the answer has anything to do with the world energy crisis, much less be directly responsible for it.

The question is this: “What were and are the profound implications of Lorentz’s 1892 arbitrary symmetrization of the Heaviside equations, which arbitrarily excluded all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems from the new electrical engineering model just being pasted together for introducing into our universities worldwide?”

For a rigorous technical answer, see M. W. Evans et al.,“Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, pp. 513-517.

 Quoting the Abstract: “It is shown that if the Lorentz condition is discarded, the Maxwell-Heaviside field equations become the Lehnert equations, indicating the presence of charge density and current density in the vacuum. The Lehnert equations are a subset of the O(3) Yang-Mills field equations. Charge and current density in the vacuum are defined straightforwardly in terms of the vector potential and scalar potential, and are conceptually similar to Maxwell’s displacement current, which also occurs in the classical vacuum. A demonstration is made of the existence of a time dependent classical vacuum polarization which appears if the Lorentz condition is discarded. Vacuum charge and current appear phenomenologically in the Lehnert equations but fundamentally in the O(3) Yang-Mills theory of classical electrodynamics. The latter also allows for the possibility of the existence of vacuum topological magnetic charge density and topological magnetic current density. Both O(3) and Lehnert equations are superior to the Maxwell-Heaviside equations in being able to describe phenomena not amenable to the latter. In theory, devices can be made to extract the energy associated with vacuum charge and current.” [p. 513.]

In short, this single action by Lorentz was deliberately and knowingly done to discard all that class of permissible Maxwellian systems that can and will extract and use extra free EM energy from the seething vacuum/spacetime. That class of Maxwellian systems contains asymmetric systems – and they are no longer in the standard EE model at all. They never have been, since they were deliberately discarded before the very beginning of electrical engineering itself.

J. P. Morgan is the beauty who ordered this done. Tesla – who gave us the rotating magnetic field used in modern generators, who gave us radio (upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1943), and who gave us AC power – had discovered that the “medium” (spacetime itself) was active, and that systems could be built which activated this medium and then took their necessary input energy from that activated medium (vacuum/spacetime).

In short, Tesla was preparing to give the world unlimited free electrical energy, extracted directly from the local seething vacuum. Quoting Tesla:

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].

“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].

“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].

"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].

Morgan had recognized Tesla as his mortal foe, and was in process of destroying both Tesla and Westinghouse, who – by placing practical AC generators on line at Niagara falls, had crushed a huge financial empire (DC power plants every two miles) being urged by Morgan and Edison. The demonstration of the much greater practicability of AC power convinced the world because AC could be transmitted appreciable distances down the transmission line. So the world adopted AC power instead of the Morgan/Edison DC power.

Morgan then vowed to destroy both Westinghouse and Tesla, and he did so very ruthlessly. Westinghouse lost his company and went bankrupt, and Tesla was reduced to living in a small hotel room on charitable friends, etc.

But in 1892, Tesla was hell-bent on giving the world the new “free energy from the active medium” that he had uncovered. So in addition to stopping Tesla himself, Morgan had to also stop all those future bright young students (in the new “electrical engineering” just being prepared) who might otherwise come along and – heaven forbid! – rediscover asymmetric “Tesla systems” and free energy from the active medium.

So his science advisors, using group analysis, simply advised Morgan of the fact that the Heaviside equations were still asymmetric and therefore still contained some of those “Tesla energy-from-the-active-medium” systems.

And Morgan directed that the new model be “fixed” to remove this highly hated (by Morgan) characteristic of the new theory being formed. Lorentz was elicited to do the dirty work and “fix” the Heaviside equations. He simply changed them in 1892 to “symmetrize” them, thereby arbitrarily tossing out all asymmetric Maxwellian systems and solving Morgan’s problem.

In short, since 1892 and the very beginning of electrical engineering, as a result of this subtle but very powerful “fix” placed on the electrical engineering model itself, our electrical power engineers have all been taught only to think, design, build, and deploy symmetrical Maxwellian power systems. That is, they have been taught to think and build only EM systems which cannot receive and use free EM energy from the vacuum, and which must therefore continually destroy their own internal asymmetry faster than they power their loads!

And the mutilated Heaviside-Lorentz theory (four simple vector equations, further modified to make them symmetrical) which our EE’s have been taught is not at all Maxwell’s actual theory – which is 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns. Most electrical engineers have never even seen or read the actual Maxwellian theory!

You can do a great many things in Maxwell’s quaternion theory that are totally impossible in the sadly reduced Heaviside-Lorentz equations. And Tesla’s patented circuits actually demonstrated such things. For the proof, see work by Barrett, one of the cofounders of ultrawideband radar. Particularly see T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett rigorously shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this.

After Lorentz’s deliberate discard of all asymmetric Maxwellian systems, then eight years later, in 1900, Lorentz was once again elicited to solve another “problem” that had arisen, a problem that eventually would also have eliminated the necessity to burn fuel to get energy. This “problem” was Oliver Heaviside’s shocking discovery of a giant but unaccounted curled EM energy flow component accompanying every accounted Poynting energy flow component, but more than a trillion times as great in magnitude. You see, had all our sharp young electrical engineers been taught that every generator and battery already outpours from its terminals more than a trillion times as much total EM energy flow as the operator himself inputs and pays for to mechanically crank the generator shaft, or as the battery’s chemical processes furnish, then one of them sooner or later would have figured out how to diverge some of that huge Heaviside usually-nondiverged curled energy flow – and thus would have learned how to produce very simple self-powering circuits and systems, powered directly from the vacuum.

In any special relativistic situation, the divergence of the curl is zero, and so Heaviside’s giant energy flow component just roars on off into space, not interacting with anything and just wasted. But if you deliberately apply a general relativistic process (rhythmically rotating the measuring/detecting frame, as with self-oscillation in the negative resonance absorption of the material (NRAM) process in optical physics), then the divergence of the curl is not zero after all, and some of that always-present but long-neglected giant Heaviside energy flow can be intercepted and utilized. In the NRAM process, well-known since 1967, the self-resonant medium emits some 18 times as much real EM energy flow (Poynting flow) in its output, as is in the input Poynting energy flow to the self-resonant charged medium. Negative absorption has a long history in other areas also, but the NRAM process is totally and deliberately ignored insofar as developing practical power systems.

To tease you, Dr. X, the NRAM process can be adapted to produce self-powering steam boilers. Try considering the implications of that one for a bit. Adapt the steam boiler (in most of our present electrical power plants and systems) to be self-powering from the vacuum, and once it is up and running one can then just shut down the primary power plant and the steam boiler will continue to power the steam-turbines that are in turn powering the generators and feeding the transmission lines to the distant loads.

What have also emerged today – that can be put into production anytime that (1) it is allowed and (2) our scientific community will pull its head out of the sand in the classic ostrich position – are two remarkable processes: They are (1) watergas (where the water molecule’s OH bonds are caused to fall apart freely by a local negative energy vacuum easily created), and (2) self-powering permanent magnet motors because there is a process (apparently blocked and controlled by the DOE since 2001) which can easily produce permanent magnets with asymmetric field strengths and with a high energy product. Given such asymmetric-field magnets rolling off the assembly line, then any fool can use them to easily assemble self-powering permanent magnet motors and motor-generators in 15 minutes, essentially for peanuts.

Finally, here’s something that almost all the college professors forget to teach. Rigorously, the conservation laws (of energy, momentum, etc.) apply only in special relativity situations (i.e., in a fixed frame). If we deliberately and rhythmically rotate the observer frame, then that is a general relativity situation and the conservation of energy law (of special relativity) can be and often is violated! This aspect of relativity – that allows violation of the conservation laws – was pointed out by the great Hilbert shortly after Einstein produced his theory of general relativity. Quoting Hilbert:

"I assert... that for the general theory of relativity, i.e., in the case of general invariance of the Hamiltonian function, energy equations... corresponding to the energy equations in orthogonally invariant theories do not exist at all. I could even take this circumstance as the characteristic feature of the general theory of relativity." [D. Hilbert, Gottingen Nachrichten, Vol. 4, 1917, p. 21.].

Later scientists such as Logunov and Loskutov have commented on Hilbert’s statement. Quoting them:

"In formulating the equivalence principle, Einstein actually abandoned the idea of the gravitational field as a Faraday-Maxwell field, and this is reflected in the pseudotensorial characterization of the gravitational field that he introduced. Hilbert was the first to draw attention to the consequences of this. … Unfortunately, … Hilbert was evidently not understood by his contemporaries, since neither Einstein himself nor other physicists recognized the fact that in general relativity conservation laws for energy, momentum, and angular momentum are in principle impossible." [A. A. Logunov and Yu. M. Loskutov, "Nonuniqueness of the predictions of the general theory of relativity," Sov. J. Part. Nucl., 18(3), May-June 1987, p. 179].

Let us turn to the great scientist Sir Roger Penrose, for a clear statement of the startling fact that in general relativity the usual familiar conservation laws need not apply. Quoting Penrose:

“We seem to have lost those most crucial conservation laws of physics, the laws of conservation of energy and momentum!” [Penrose then adds the Killing symmetry arbitrarily, to get conservation again, when the Killing vector applies and gravity is separated.]. “These conservation laws hold only in a spacetime for which there is the appropriate symmetry, given by the Killing vector ĸ…. [These considerations] do not really help us in understanding what the fate of the conservation laws will be when gravity itself becomes an active player. We still have not regained our missing conservation laws of energy and momentum, when gravity enters the picture. ... This awkward-seeming fact has, since the early days of general relativity, evoked some of the strongest objections to that theory, and reasons for unease with it, as expressed by numerous physicists over the years. … in fact Einstein’s theory takes account of energy-momentum conservation in a rather sophisticated way – at least in those circumstances where such a conservation law is most needed. …Whatever energy there is in the gravitational field itself is to be excluded from having any representation…” [Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2005, p. 457-458.]

Note that this “solution” accepted by many general relativists is to just arbitrarily toss out the gravity and gravitational energy density of spacetime in a given troublesome case, and the problem of nonconservation of energy and momentum then vanishes. In short, they just arbitrarily separate the spacetime itself from the fields, and there is no problem! This is equivalent to stating that the fields themselves do not exist in spacetime! However, simply avoiding the problem itself is not solving the problem! Considering the neglected and unaccounted giant Heaviside energy flow always accompanying every Poynting EM energy flow, the gravity effect is always at least of importance, and this “solution” itself is in general nearly always untenable.

Note that the NRAM process does use a general relativistic situation (the rhythmically rotated to-and-fro frames of the self-oscillating charged absorbing medium to then reradiate 18 times as much Poynting energy flow emission from the general relativistic absorbing medium as is in the Poynting energy flow input to that medium. Optical physicists are required to say that the NRAM process “increases the reaction cross section”, etc. and to use the term “negative absorption” instead of “excess emission”. But those optimized NRAM experiments in the infrared and in the UV are performed every year in the optical physics branch of the physics departments of all leading technical and scientific universities.

We stress again: There is no real energy crisis. Instead, there is a totally and deliberately arranged crisis and breakdown of our own scientific community, and one that has been (sadly) deliberately set up since way back. Some of it is nefarious and by deliberate intent. That is particularly true of the sabotage of the overall electrical engineering theoretical model since before its very inception.

So, eerily, our own EEs do not even know what actually powers an EM circuit attached to a generator. It is not from the mechanical shaft energy we crank into the generator! All that does (check it out) is produce the rotating magnetic field inside the rotating generator (courtesy of Nikola Tesla) which in turn is totally dissipated right inside the generator to force opposite charges apart in opposite directions. This action produces the internal source dipole – a classic broken symmetry – inside the generator and between its terminals. And that is all that the mechanical energy input by cranking the shaft of the generator does; it forms the source dipole inside the generator. (If we would form that source dipole once and then leave it alone and not automatically destroy it, then we could quit cranking the generator shaft thereafter).

When we have a broken symmetry (such as that dipole inside the generator), it freely absorbs virtual energy from the seething virtual vacuum and integrates it into emitted quanta – real, observable, usable EM energy which it re-emits. And that emission of real energy extracted directly from the virtual state vacuum is the EM energy flow emerging from the generator terminals and flowing through space along and outside the external conductors. A tiny bit of that enormous “energy from the vacuum” (the diverged Poynting component) is diverged into the conductors to power up the electrons. Usually the rest of it – the giant Heaviside curled energy flow component – is just wasted and roars on off into space, interacting with nothing in the observer’s fixed frame.

And every dipolar system is powered by EM energy taken directly from the seething virtual state vacuum. Not a single EE textbook in the U.S. or in the world even contains that simple information (available since 1957 from Lee and Yang’s discovery, but totally unknown back when the sad old EE model was wired together and then so severely limited by deliberate action).

Now let us look at something very different. Let us examine the startling thing that can happen when we engineer the local vacuum to have negative energy and therefore to produce negative probabilities in its ongoing most fundamental interactions with local charged matter.

In physics, the fundamental Shrödinger equation and Dirac’s first relativistic extension of it (as well as his original electron theory) all contain negative energy and therefore negative probabilities. A thing that has already happened and is “continually existing”, can then be “unhappened” by negative energy in the vacuum and its negative probabilities in all the primary physics equations!!! This astonishing characteristic of negative energy and its associated negative probabilities was so repugnant to most scientists and mathematicians that a consortium of scientists (such as Pauli and Heisenberg) ruthlessly forced it to be arbitrarily discarded from physics.

Hence the basic mechanism for “watergas” – tricking the water molecule to fall apart into H2 and O2 freely, and then burning the H2 and O2 – was arbitrarily discarded from physics in the 1930s, specifically in 1934. See Hotson’s two part paper, referenced below, for the specifics.

Here’s a note I sent a correspondent (a highly qualified physicist) on the watergas process, revealing its unsuspected true mechanism.


WATERGAS: Presently we have a very viable (and now scientifically verified) alternative to carbon-based fuels etc. that is beginning to rapidly emerge. That is “watergas”, which has a history going back to the 1920s. Several legitimate inventors right now have viable watergas systems and processes, where the H-O-H molecule can be tricked to just “fall apart” because the O-H bond is “unhappened” by use of negative energy in the local vacuum and the accompanying negative probabilities. I know one of them personally.

In the 1930s, some of our leading physicists and mathematical scientists so hated negative energy (that emerges from the Shrödinger equation and from Dirac’s relativistic extension of it, and also in Dirac’s original electron theory) and its associated negative probabilities, that they arbitrarily and rather furiously tossed it out of physics – out of the Dirac relativistic extension to the Shrödinger equation, out of Dirac’s electron theory, and out of quantum field theory. The “unthinkable negative energy problem” and how it is dogmatically regarded by most of our scientific community even today, is given in this quote from Lawrie:

“The negative energy solutions are an embarrassment, because they imply the existence of single-particle states with energy less than that of the vacuum. Intuitively, this is nonsensical. In fact, there is no lower limit to the energy spectrum. This means that the vacuum is unstable, since an infinite amount of energy could be released from it by the spontaneous creation of particles in negative energy states. … it is the negative energy states which give rise to a negative probability density.” [Ian D. Lawrie, A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics, CRC Press, 1990, p. 130; he is speaking of the Shrödinger equation and derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation from it with two problems – negative energy states and negative probability density.].

Dirac himself at first adhered to negative energy and negative probabilities because they occurred completely naturally and automatically in his relativistic extension and in his electron theory. Quoting Dirac:

“Negative energies and probabilities should not be considered as nonsense. They are well-defined concepts mathematically, like a negative of money." [P. A. M. Dirac, “The physical interpretation of quantum mechanics.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 180, 1942, pp. 1-40.]

However, later a thoroughly beaten and pummeled Dirac caved in to the fierce and unrelenting peer pressure of his adamant colleagues such as Pauli, Heisenberg and others, and then he reluctantly and personally participated in eliminating the negative energy. Quoting a rather chastened Dirac later:

“I remember once when I was in Copenhagen, that Bohr asked me what I was working on and I told him I was trying to get a satisfactory relativistic theory of the electron, and Bohr said ‘But Klein and Gordon have already done that!’ That answer first rather disturbed me. Bohr seemed quite satisfied by Klein’s solution, but I was not because of the negative probabilities that it led to. I just kept on with it, worrying about getting a theory which would have only positive probabilities.” [Conversation between Dirac and J. Mehra, Mar. 28, 1969, quoted by Mehra in Aspects of Quantum Theory, ed. A. Salam and E. P. Wigner, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973.]

So today a Dirac hole is erroneously called a positron (positive mass-energy and positive EM energy fields). Instead, it is a negative mass-energy electron, which as a source charge produces negative EM energy fields from this negative charge. Dirac lamely pointed out that our instruments will normally not see the hole itself, but will observe its filling when another normal electron falls into it and fills it. He pointed out that the instrument would thus see a “positive mass-energy change” (from minus one to zero) in the positive charge direction (from a negative charge of one to zero).

So the physicists started referring to the “hole” as a “hill up from the bottom of the hole”, or in short, substituting the “filling of the hole” as the “existence of the hole itself”. This is a simple logical non sequitur and totally false.

You see, Dr. X, the “problem” with negative energy and its concomitant negative probabilities in the ongoing interaction with the seething vacuum reduces to this: In modern physics a thing that has “occurred” or “happened” (and is thus sustained and “always” observable), is based on subsidiary statistical operations ongoing between the active vacuum and all the charges. All observable forces are generated in interacting matter by the exchange of virtual particles between the local vacuum and the material particles, according to our very best theory, quantum field theory. This absolutely cannot be avoided. E.g., quoting Aitchison:

"...the concept of a 'single particle' actually breaks down in relativistic quantum field theory with interactions, because the interactions between 'the particle' and the vacuum fluctuations (or virtual quanta) cannot be ignored." [I. J. R. Aitchison, "Nothing's Plenty: The Vacuum in Modern Quantum Field Theory," Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 357.].

And quoting Aitchison again:

“Forces, in quantum field theory, are understood as being due to the exchange of virtual quanta...” [Aitchison, Ibid., p. 372].

So underneath that “observable or happened entity” in physics there is a sustaining and producing set of more subtle statistical processes – calculated (usually) with a positive energy vacuum interaction and thus with positive probabilities interacting. When the positive probabilities (due to positive energy) in those underlying processes – of that observable or happened entity – reach a total of 100%, that is “certainty” and so there is the resulting physical (observable) entity present and sustained – so long as the local sustaining positive energy vacuum is not altered to add negative energy and negative probabilities to those underlying processes. That observed (happened) thing will then be there, every time you check on it, with any and all instruments.

So the observable entity/state has “happened” and it “stays happened”, normally – due to the underlying creating/sustaining interactions with the normally assumed positive energy vacuum.

Yet it is very, very easy to induce the local vacuum to have negative energy! E.g., just create lots of normal, tiny little RF pulses in that space, and each pulse “pops out” some electrons from the Dirac Sea, leaving behind the empty holes themselves. Since they are actually negative mass-energy entities having negative EM energy fields, one has just conditioned the local vacuum to have a “froth” of negative energy, both in its mass-energy aspects and in its EM energy aspects.

And if one’s theoretical model allows negative energy of the vacuum – and thus provides negative probabilities in underlying and ongoing primary statistical processes and interactions with the vacuum – then by conditioning the local vacuum with negative energy (so easily done, by the way, as clearly shown for more than 20 years by my close friend John Bedini), one also creates those negative probabilities in those underlying statistical processes. And that is a very profound and fundamental change to present science and scientific method.

That means that the probability of something that has “happened” and is observably sustained seemingly 100% of the time, can – at will – be lowered from 100% to 70% or even to zero percent. This in turn means that something that has physically “happened” and is thus being sustained observably continually and “permanently”, can deliberately be “unhappened” by simply conditioning the local vacuum to properly have negative energy. Indeed, the thing that has already happened can be “unhappened completely” so that it disappears and is not there at all, regardless of how many instruments one then employs to look.

Once one forms and maintains the Dirac holes (the negative energy froth), then the Dirac sea holes and their radiating negative EM energy  in the local vacuum itself are continually furnishing all the “energy” necessary to unhappen that O-H bond in the water.

Note how universally this applies – not just to water for watergas, but to just about everything and every process presently in physics. Any and all can now be directly “precursor engineered” merely by directly engineering the local vacuum and its ongoing continual reactions with the process or entity one wishes to change or “unhappen”. Any dread disease has “happened” and developed in the body, etc. because of positive energy vacuum basic statistical interactions and positive probabilities increasing to certainty.

For example, by adding negative energy in the local vacuum and its resulting negative probabilities, any specific disease can in theory be directly “unhappened” and eliminated. Easily and without harsh measures, simply by properly ‘conditioning’ the local vacuum to cause it to have the requisite negative energy.

But normal physics threw out the negative vacuum energy, by assuming that the Dirac Sea holes are always filled, as witness the additional statement by Aitchison. Quoting Aitchison again:

"The Dirac electron vacuum is that state with all negative energy electron states fully occupied." [Aitchison, ibid., p. 360].

Hence anything one does to pop out some electrons filling those Dirac holes, and leaving behind the negative energy holes in the Dirac Sea vacuum, will produce a negative energy vacuum and thus negative probabilities. Simply putting in lots of RF pulses is one example of producing a local “froth” of negative energy vacuum, consisting of those emptied Dirac Sea holes. In turn, those negative probabilities then can “unhappen” the existence of a dread disease.

And this process – of unhappening a bad disease easily and painlessly – has already been done and independently verified by legitimate scientists. We will go into that in a moment; Dr. Kanzius’ cancer treatment uses that mechanism and it has been independently verified by a recognized and dependable independent cancer research institute, the M.D. Anderson Cancer Institute in Houston, Texas by Dr. Steven A. Curley, professor in surgical oncology. Dr. Curley stated, “This is the most exciting new therapy for cancer that I have seen in over 20 years of cancer research." The process has also been investigated by The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (by Dr. David A. Geller, co-director of the Liver Cancer Center).

In the watergas technique, e.g., an inventor uses one or another of the easy methods of conditioning the local vacuum with negative energy. As we stated, one very simple method is just to use a sort of “froth” of very weak RF pulses. This pops out electrons from the Dirac Sea, leaving behind a frothy sea of negative mass-energy Dirac holes (a hole is a negative mass-energy electron, not a positron as commonly assumed by subterfuge). Specifically this negative energy local vacuum in which the water is embedded, strongly affects the O-H bonds, so that to us (observably) they seem to just “fall apart”. They actually fall apart because of the changes resulting in their underlying sustaining processes in interaction with the now-altered active vacuum that now contains negative energy. Technically this means that the previous 100% probability of those established O-H bonds are lowered, and even that the O-H bonds are totally vanished or “unhappened”. The O-O bonds and H-H bonds, on the other hand, are more firmly increased, so that in the affected water there appear bubbles of H2 and O2 mixed together, as the H-O-H molecules fall apart because of the vanishing and “unhappening” of their O-H bonds. Done correctly, this then becomes a pretty safe thing, because in that changing water (in its negative energy vacuum) the freed O2 and H2 will not explode as in a normal vacuum, because of their great difficulty in forming O-H bonds in the presence of a decisively negative energy vacuum and strong negative O-H probabilities.

This means that one can then direct the stabilized bubbles of H2 and O2 to a short distance (even a few inches) away from that locally conditioned negative energy vacuum, to a “more normal” vacuum – and then the O2 and H2 will again burn very nicely (as in the chambers of a piston engine in a car) because once again the O-H bond is strongly permitted. In this way, one can power an automobile from watergas alone, or augment the use of normal gasoline with simultaneous combined use of watergas, etc.

In short, one can input pure salt water to a small “watergas” system whose vacuum is negatively energized. The H2 and O2 output of that local “negatively energized” vacuum are then fed a few inches away, into a combustion chamber existing in a normal “positive energy” vacuum. There the H2 and O2 gases burn very nicely, again forming H2O.

So one inputs water (say, to one’s modified automobile engine), and the engine powers smoothly and normally, emitting only water as its exhaust.

One inputs water and the system outputs water. Very, very clean! And also very, very cheap and practical!

The same process, applied to cancers in the living body, can “unhappen” the cancer (which is being maintained by those same statistical underlying processes that formed it in the first place). And the cancer will then “heal up” or, in other words, “unhappen” gradually and disappear because of the addition of negative probabilities. The process of Dr. John Kanzius has already proved this, and it has also been independently verified in a separate and respected cancer research institute. One can easily Google all that openly on the web – both Kanzius’ cancer process and its independent validation, and his watergas process and its independent validation.

Scientifically, Kanzius has completed the requirements of the scientific method. Once the experiment is independently replicated and proven, then – if one’s current model disagrees with those validated experiments – then one’s model must be changed to agree with the validated experiments. Otherwise, one practices dogma rather than science.

Engineering negative energy of the vacuum and thus negative probabilities is indeed a vast leap forward in science and physics – because the physicists just arbitrarily discarded it back there decades ago. Tesla originally discovered negative energy, before the term was even available, and he called it “radiant energy” to differentiate its phenomenology from that of normal positive EM energy. John Bedini uses negative energy in his epochal battery chargers, presently maneuvering into production and marketing (the company is named Energenx and its stock is openly sold on the stock market) so the “happened” sulfation of a deteriorated battery can be “unhappened” and eliminated by the Bedini process. This dramatically restores batteries ready for the junk heap, and the lifetime of the battery can thus be extended dramatically. This is particularly very important, e.g., in large expensive batteries (as in large battery-powered materials handling equipment in warehouses, in which the Bedini process and system have been very successfully tested and proven).

Dr. John Kanzius, e.g., achieved that negative energy local vacuum and thus negative probabilities process (though he himself doesn’t appear to recognize the exact “negative vacuum energy froth and consequent negative probabilities” nature of his process) for his epochal cancer treatment process. That process is being developed by an independent cancer research institute, and it has now been through animal trials, and in the animals it cured 100% of their cancers. The cancer research institute has studied it, and pronounced the Kanzius cancer treatment as the most exciting cancer treatment seen in 20 years. Next must come human trials, then will come seeking out FDA approval for use in humans.

As you can imagine, there are some very powerful cartels that bluntly do not wish that healing process allowed or let out, or even known, and they will very probably suppress it and possibly even kill Kanzius. Certainly they are presently suppressing the watergas process as witness other inventors confronted and threatened with the murder of their little children. In the past, some watergas inventors who succeeded have been murdered. This can be independently verified.

In other words, by the same “precursor” engineering of the local vacuum with negative energy, it is possible to “unhappen” the H-O bonds, produce watergas and power our automobiles, trucks, trains, ships, etc., and thereby quickly  get off our abject dependence on foreign oil. It is also possible to rapidly develop rather simple, curative processes for any and all our present human diseases without the use of harmful drugs or harsh measures. We just have to learn how to “unhappen” the diseases with a specifically tailored negative energy vacuum – which gives the desired negative probabilities necessary to unhappen a specific disease.

Again, as you can appreciate, some very powerful people and organizations worldwide flatly do not wish that to be developed at all, and they will do whatever is necessary to stop it or contain it.

Dr. Kanzius also noted that the same process (his use of “unhappening” induced by the negativized local vacuum) affects salt water. So he developed a very good adaptation of his process for use on the water and making watergas, with the characteristics we previously mentioned. He then took his developed and tested watergas process and system to a recognized authority on water chemistry, Dr. Rustum Roy, a Penn State University chemist, who has subjected the process to many rigorous tests. When finally finished, Dr. Roy publicly proclaimed this discovery is "the most remarkable in water science in 100 years”.

Again, this can be independently verified.

Again, Dr. Kanzius has completed the scientific method’s requirement – independent validation scientifically and experimentally! The ball is now in the court of our scientific leaders. Will they practice scientific method and go for this revolutionary new development? Or will they keep their collective heads firmly buried in the sand in their present ostrich position?

Late last year, Kanzius stated that his watergas process had now achieved overunity (coefficient of performance of COP>1.0) which means the burning of the resulting fuel resulted in more usable energy in the powered system than the operator had to input to the watergas process), and so he would not be saying anything else about it for awhile. In short, now it was time for patenting and protecting intellectual property rights.

Before the professional skeptics descend on you and proclaim that no system can output more energy than the operator himself inputs, point out to them that windmills, solar cell arrays, home heat pumps, hydroelectric power plants, etc. do it all the time. All that is required is an additional energy input from the local environment, in addition to what the operator pays to input. The efficiency remains less than 100%, but the COP can be greater than one, and it can even be infinite (self-powering) by the operator not having to input any energy at all. A common home heat pump usually has an efficiency of about 50%, and so it wastes half of all the energy input to it by all sources (both the operator and the environment). But it receives so much extra heat energy from its environment, that it can still output three to four times as much heat energy as the electrical energy the operator himself pays to input. Hence its COP = 3.0 to 4.0.

And tell them there is no such thing as a “second law of thermodynamics”! Instead, there is a second law of the hoary old antique equilibrium thermodynamics. In the much more modern nonequilibrium thermodynamics, one can violate the hoary old “equilibrium” second law of the equilibrium thermodynamics because there is a continual free input of energy into the system. In standard textbooks, there are several known, proven, and recognized things that allow one to violate the old second law of equilibrium thermodynamics. One of them is simply a sharp gradient of energy density across a region of space. Even Maxwell himself (also a thermodynamicist of some note) was aware that the old second law of equilibrium thermodynamics can be and is violated. Quoting Maxwell:

"The truth of the second law is … a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules… Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." [J. C. Maxwell, “Tait's Thermodynamics II,” Nature 17, 278–280 (7 February 1878)].

And be prepared for the charge of “dirty old perpetual motion”. Just inform the skeptical idiots that Newton’s first law of motion is in fact the law of perpetual motion! Toss an object away in a straight line in deep space, and it will continue in that straight line and in that state of motion forever, unless and until an external force intervenes upon the object to forcefully change its state of motion to something else – which it will then continue indefinitely if not further interrupted. Also, our solid state physics students in their junior year routinely do perpetual motion experiments – a superconducting current initiated in a closed loop. That current will continue to infinity before it slowly declines to zero over that infinite time. To decline by half, it requires some 10exp23 years – many orders of magnitude longer than the observable physical universe itself has apparently existed.

Now it is also time to expect some very strong suppression efforts to be mounted against that process and against Kanzius himself.

But in short, this (use of the negative energy asymmetric vacuum) is one process by which asymmetrical EM processes can be engendered in water, in living bodies, and in other physical material systems. The impact on science and engineering is likely to be profound – it is a great leap forward by at least 200 years.

Bob Boyce (with whom I’ve personally met) also has a very viable and very good watergas process, and it is my understanding that strong work is underway by Boyce and an associate to be able to power automobiles on watergas and demonstrate the resulting autos powered on water, widely and publicly. I believe they are presently modifying some Toyota Prius automobiles to use the process, and then will drive them around nationally with some newsmen to generate high national visibility. Boyce uses the Aharonov-Bohm effect of a toroidal coil and lots of tiny RF pulsing to achieve excellent conditioning of the local vacuum around and outside the coil with uncurled A-potential with negative EM energy in that uncurled A-potential. Each sharp little RF gradient (each little pulse) pops some electrons out of local Dirac sea holes, leaving the empty holes behind – which are negative mass energy electrons, NOT positrons. (Negative mass-energy Dirac holes are the “dark matter” our astrophysicists are so arduously seeking with their telescopes). As a source charge, a Dirac Sea hole produces negative energy EM fields – and that is the “dark energy” the same astrophysicists are so arduously seeking.

Both dark matter and dark energy can be easily and readily evoked on the lab bench, and thus they can be experimentally studied. Bedini has been using them for more than 20 years in his epochal battery-charging processes.

As a result of using the AB effect to smoothly condition the local volume of vacuum in which the water resides, with negative energy (a negative energy “froth” of emptied Dirac sea holes), Boyce is able to (1) very smoothly “unhappen” the H-O bonds of the water molecules in that “activated” negative energy vacuum, (2) strengthen the H-H and O-O bonds, and (3) make a very viable and very useful watergas process. Even though bubbles of H2 and O2 gas are profusely mixed in the water, they do not explode therein because of the great difficulty in producing the O-H bond in that region due to its negative energy vacuum. In short, the OH bond has been “unhappened” in that region. But by piping the gas a few inches outside that little negativized vacuum region where the watergas is produced, and running the H2 and O2 into the chamber of a combustion engine, one can then very efficiently burn the H2 and O2 because now the O-H bonds are no longer prohibited since the combustion chamber vacuum is still a “normal” vacuum and not negativized.

With the escalating world fuel crisis and the resulting world energy crisis, it appears that the watergas process and “engineering the local vacuum” to accomplish precursor engineering of the underlying precursor statistical processes creating and sustaining a given object or process is something whose “time has come”. It can be rigorously tested by our academic community, and some rigorous testing has already been done with extraordinarily positive results.

The potential for powering our automobiles, trains, ships, etc. with watergas is tremendously important. One inputs water only, and the engine outputs water only. So one takes some water from the environment, uses the vacuum to engineer it, then uses the watergas to power out loads, and exhausts only water back to the same environment. Thus it is an environment-enhancing process par excellence, and it could greatly clean up our present pollution of our precious biosphere.

We strongly accent that several other inventors also presently have viable watergas processes.

We point out that the Fogal semiconductor has also demonstrated the ability to directly and dynamically engineer its surrounding local vacuum/spacetime for nearly 20 years now, and Fogal has continued to be rigorously suppressed, even though several important and competent independent laboratories have tested his chip and verified its unique functioning – such as instant communication to any distance without travel through the “intervening” ordinary space between the two (or any number of) widely separated stations. He actually uses a multiply-connected spacetime for that communication, so any number of widely separate points can have “instant communication” between them with no time delay at all. Again, this has been independently tested and verified by several laboratories. But it continues to be ruthlessly suppressed from extraordinarily high level. Fogal is also a personal friend of mine.

And we really must go back and correct that great error of the 1930s, when physicists very stupidly and arbitrarily tossed out negative energy and negative probabilities. It can be (and is being) rigorously shown to be a great error in science.

For example, Dan Solomon, (Dean of the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, North Carolina State University) has also rigorously and theoretically shown that throwing out negative energy from physics (the relativistic extension of the Shrödinger equation, Dirac’s theory, and from quantum field theory) was and is a serious mistake. One may Google quite a few important papers by Solomon, many published in high quality scientific journals. A few are:

Dan Solomon, "Some new results concerning the vacuum in Dirac’s hole theory," Physica Scripta, Vol. 74, 2006, p. 117–122. Quoting:

“In Dirac’s hole theory (HT), the vacuum state is generally believed to be the state of minimum energy. It will be shown that this is not, in fact, the case and that there must exist states in HT with less energy than the vacuum state. It will be shown that energy can be extracted from the HT vacuum state through application of an electric field.”

See also (1) Dan Solomon, “Some differences between Dirac's hole theory and quantum field theory.” Can. J. Phys., Vol. 83, 2005, pp. 257-271; and (2) Dan Solomon, “Mathematical Inconsistencies in Dirac Field Theory,” 1999. Available at quant-ph/9904106.

Particularly see Dan Solomon, “Negative energy density for a Dirac-Maxwell field.” 1999. Available at gr-qc/9907060. See

     Abstract: It is well known that there can be negative energy densities in quantum field theory. Most of the work done in this area has involved free non-interacting systems. In this paper we show how a quantum state with negative energy density can be formulated for a Dirac field interacting with an Electromagnetic field. It will be shown that, for this case, there exist quantum states whose average energy density over an arbitrary volume is a negative number with an arbitrarily large magnitude.

We posted a write-up on the watergas process on our website, the little article “MEG Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Watergas, Negative Energy, Negative Probabilities, Precursor Engineering, Extending the Scientific Method, and EM Limitations,” 7 April 2008.

The late Dr. Eugene Mallove published two very important articles by D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20 (available at available at and D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part II, New Energy, Issue 44, 2002, pp. 1-24; available at

Quoting Hotson:

“I think if one had to point to a single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation.” [D. L. Hotson, “Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.]

So watergas and the use of precursor engineering (conditioning the local vacuum/spacetime first, and then allowing that conditioned vacuum/spacetime to directly alter a situation, an object, or a state, are two things whose “time has come”.

And it couldn’t come at a better time than now, with the energy crisis and a great economic debacle descending directly upon the U.S. and Western Europe.


Dr. “X”, here is an eerie one for you to look into also.

In 2001 our own Department of Energy apparently stepped in and “appropriated” an invention that was for a process to easily make asymmetric permanent magnets – permanent magnets having an asymmetric field. Of course, once one has the magnets themselves already with the necessary lateral field strength asymmetry, then any fool can easily assemble self-powering PM motors and motor-generators in 15 minutes. Piece of cake!

The original patent was:

Vijay K. Chandhok and Bao-min Ma. “Method for producing a noncircular permanent magnet”.  United States Patent No. 4,915,891, issued April. 10,1990.

     Abstract: A method for producing a noncircular magnet having asymmetric magnetic properties along axes thereof. A particle charge of composition from which the magnet is to be produced is placed in a container, heated and extruded within the container to compact the particle charge to substantially full density. The particle charge may include at least one rare earth element. The particle charge may be extruded through a noncircular extrusion die, specifically a rectangular die.

Then the U.S. DOE went to Chandhok and gave him a grant to develop essentially the same process, but now under DOE and government control!

An international patent was then filed and obtained by Chandhok as follows:

Vijak K. Chandhok, WO/2001/084569 A1) “Method for Producing through Extrusion an Anisotropic Magnet with High Energy Product”, International patent, 9 Mar. 2001. The patent contains the following note:

 “This invention was made with government support under a small business research and development grant for "A Simple Process to Manufacture Grain Aligned Permanent Magnets" awarded by the U. S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-FG02-97-ER82313). The Government has certain rights to this invention.”

     Our Comment: In short, the government (DoE) has assumed control over it.

     Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically, by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the container and particle charge and extruding the container and particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a manner that one of the cross-sectional axes or dimension of the container and particle charge is held substantially constant during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the smallest cross-sectional dimension of the extruded magnet.

Then eerily, in 2004 Chandhok obtained yet another U.S. patent, on essentially the same process. It is:

Vijak K. Chandhok, “Method for producing through extrusion an anisotropic magnet with high energy product”, U.S. Patent No. 6,787,083 issued on Sep. 7, 2004.

     Abstract: A method for producing an anisotropic magnet with high energy product through extrusion and, more specifically, by placing a particle charge of a composition from the which magnet is to be produced in a noncircular container, heating the container and particle charge and extruding the container and particle charge through a noncircular extrusion die in such a manner that one of the cross-sectional axes or dimension of the container and particle charge is held substantially constant during the extrusion to compact the particle charge to substantially full density by mechanical deformation produced during the extrusion to achieve a magnet with anisotropic magnetic properties along the axes or dimension thereof and, more specifically, a high energy product along the transverse of the smallest cross-sectional dimension of the extruded magnet.

So what does one conclude from all that?

Either everybody in the entire DOE is a total raving dunce with no knowledge of group symmetry or modern physics at all, or else the DOE has had asymmetric permanent magnets – and hence self-powering permanent magnet motors and motor-generators – since at least 2001.

If so, they’ve apparently hidden it from the President, from the Congress, from the scientific community, and from the American Public. In my own view as a retired U.S. Army officer and Viet Nam veteran, if it’s true then it is equated to high treason.

There you have it. Please have some highly qualified physicists – who are aware of the arbitrary removal from physics of negative energy and its accompanying negative probabilities -- review this material and the references.

What we are saying is that the energy crisis can be solved completely, cleanly, and cheaply – anytime it is allowed and anytime that our scientific community will fund it and get with it.

In my own opinion, the track record of all of them is so bad that we require a new Manhattan Project – say, reporting directly to the office of the President and to a single select committee in Congress – to solve the energy crisis by (1) using EM energy taken freely from the vacuum and (2) particularly by the use of structured negative energy from the vacuum.

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden

Lt. Col., U.S. Army (Retired)