The Tom Bearden



Subject: RE: New Theory
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:07:16 -0500
This is a decent shot at getting at the unified field theory aspects.  These have been very well developed in basis, in Sachs' unified field theory.  The Evans O(3) extended electrodynamics is an important subset of Sachs theory, and so for the first time one is getting into the area of being able to do engineering of the general relativity effects via use of extended electrodynamics.
A somewhat more advanced expose of what Mr. XXXX  is speaking of, is to approach it on the level of where one chooses one's fundamental units for one's model of physics.  Most engineering students, etc. are totally unaware that the fundamental units used are totally a matter of choice and convenience.  One actually needs only a single fundamental unit, and then all other units become functions of that one fundamental.  It's done in physics, e.g., and the fundamental unit usually chosen is length.  Then everything -- energy, mass, time, the works -- becomes a function of length.
Actually length is part of 3-space, and thus part of the "effect" after detection/observation.  By making length the fundamental variable, we are ever in the business of trying to describe the cause in terms of the effect.
A better way is to choose energy as the fundamental unit, since the energy concept is sufficiently imprecise as to apply regardless of the number of dimensions.  Then time, for example, becomes totally an energy function.  This then allows one to deal with the "cause" directly, and derive the "effect" later.
Hopefully in the future we will see this type of work done.  Of course the expressions for such models can be horrendous, but they models will yield all the correct answers and so are "correct" (at least as correct as the usual models).
So his insight was on the right path, but in choosing directions in 3-space he still held to the effect.
And of course the standard "illustration" (so-called) of the E and B fields at right angles to the line of motion in 3-space is quite wrong and a horrendous logical error.  In fact, the editor of American Journal of Physics took that standard diagram (it's in all the texts) severely to task in one of his recent editorials.  Here is the reference:

Romer, Robert H., "Heat is not a noun," American Journal of Physics, 69(2), Feb. 2001, p. 107-109. Editorial discussion by the Editor of AJP of the concept of heat in thermodynamics, where heat is not a substance, hot a thermodynamic function of state, and should not be used as a noun. In endnote 24, p. 109, he also takes to task "…that dreadful diagram purporting to show the electric and magnetic fields of a plane wave, as a function of position (and/or time?) that besmirch the pages of almost every introductory book. …it is a horrible diagram. 'Misleading' would be too kind a word; 'wrong' is more accurate." "…perhaps then, for historical interest, [we should] find out how that diagram came to contaminate our literature in the first place."


Tom Bearden

Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:41:06 -0400
From: Correspondent
To: <>
Subject: To: Tom Bearden


  I independently developed in 1998 and from totally different premises a theory about time and light waves. Of course it had been around for a long time;
Sir Hamilton 1937, Nikola Tesla, etc. among a host of people who worked on it, and work at publicizing it ..

  I believe that they all missed the final key to unlock the big picture. You and others are still dragging around the B field and the E field without knowing what they are about...Is it ?

  The Key: Superimpose the tempic model of the photon with the classical radio wave model. Two models are better than one because one connects us to experience (E & B) and the other to our understanding (tempic wave). What you find by this superimposition of the two models is the following:

  the  E field is a line along which the variation of the rate of flow of time changes direction: from increasing to decreasing or vice-versa. (slope or first derivative is zero, but the value is different than the local rate of flow of time)

  The B field is the rate of the flow of time in the process of variation.
The tempic wave - mental image is now complete. The E and B fields are variations of time themselves; was it possible otherwise when one knows the relationship between the two fields in time;

           dB/dt => dE/dt   and  dE/dt => dB/dt
    Can B and E be anything else than time variations themselves?

 Strangely, we describe the whole universe in terms of B and E yet we don't know what they are!!  If you ask me what is time? My answer will be: "What is not time ?


Ottawa, Canada