Subject: RE: Phase conjugate
replica waves Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:57:32 -0600
PPS.
Dear Paul,
And I forgot to
congratulate you upon your deep interest and in building the
simulation. That is excellent. It is also why I took the time to try to
answer you more fully; I greatly admired your persistence and
stick-to-it-iveness.
As an old dog, the
time I personally have remaining to work on such things is very
limited. Hence the necessity to put much of it on the web, freely
available. To prevent the usual rush from flame artists, etc. and
others who love cur dog fights but do little if any new science
themselves, we simply do not answer. We have plainly stated that, if
anything on the site is useful, then we are glad and that is its
purpose. If it is not useful, then the scanner should simply go look
elsewhere.
We encourage you to
think a bit from time to time, about how mass does not exist in time but
masstime does. And exactly what happens to the time-increment or
component of a photon when it is absorbed by a mass. One cannot just
throw it away; it's there. So by absorbing a photon and converting its
spatial energy component dE into a little bit of extra mass dm, where dm
= dE/(c-squared), one has m + (dE)(dt) => (m + dm)dt. That is the
"excited state" and it is masstime, not mass. Masstime is as different
from mass as impulse (Ft) is different from F. Not only has one excited
that former mass with spatial energy, but one also has excited it with a
time increment, over in the time domain. That is actually a
time-polarized (scalar) photon effect, or highly compressed EM energy
effect over on the fourth Minkowski axis, as a change in the t. Then
the excited state (the masstime) decays and re-emits a photon, which in
the simplest case is (m + dm)dt => m + (dE)(dt), where dEdt is the
emitted photon.
So a mass (frozen
instantaneous observable) "moves through time" via the photon process,
and by iterative change in state this way: m … mt …m … mt … m … and so
forth. Notice that mass never emits a photon! Masstime does.
Also, the "mass's
movement through time" is an electromagnetic and engineerable process.
Further, it is the total photon interaction that is involved -- both
virtual photons and observable photons. Hence even differential pieces
of a mass move through time with a vast "internal structuring" of its
time-stream, from a vast internal structuring of ongoing photon
interactions.
Also, one can begin to
see that it is possible to also engineer and move the mass "backwards"
in time. Or more acceptably, move a "mass-energy" backwards in time,
just as the equations of physics imply.
The arrow of time is
not immutable absolutely; but it is immutable so long as one does not
engineer the fundamental mechanism that is ongoing when a "mass moves
through time".
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden |