Saturday, December 02, 2000 2:25 PM
Hal Fox; firstname.lastname@example.org
James L. Kenny
RE: Reply to Query from Jed Rothwell
The researcher who replicated the MEG was
Jean-Louis Naudin in France.
obtained COP = 7.3 in his later (third) build-up after an initial
COP = 1.3. We have obtained COP = 17 to 20, higher in some
build-ups, and we deliberately pushed one unit to destruction of the
coil, with the unit reaching COP>100 just before the arc-over and
destruction of the coils.
At the request of our patent attorneys and the university, we are
close the name of the university until their report is completed.
arrangements have been made for the university's scientific team to
test it, but to physically and independently replicate it from
under U.S. Department of Defense auspices (the university team works
DoD program in power supplies). The university scientists will
replication to our specifications, but they will order the parts, wind
coils, make the assembly, and produce everything completely
from Magnetics Energy Limited, to which the intellectual property
We are also arranging for independent testing by a
private testing laboratory with an international reputation and with
impeccable credentials (many of the large aerospace industries use
laboratory for certification testing on a great variety of U.S.
contracts). After observing the fierce dogmatic hassle that the
establishment poured on cold fusion and on the institutes and
involved, you can understand why we are not releasing which
which DoD agency, and which independent test laboratory. We are
do straightforward scientific work for review by openminded
There are five persons who in combined effort invented the motionless
electromagnetic generator (MEG). Beside myself they are Dr. Jim
Lee Kenny, engineer Ken Moore, and engineer Steve Patrick. These
four researchers have worked very long and hard on this project, which
succeeded only after nearly a decade of effort.
As soon as we have these independent tests completed and the
university replication completed and tested, we will have presented
scientific community with a validated, replicated experimental unit
proving that electrical power systems with COP>1.0 are not only
feasible and practical. In short, if the present conventional
disagrees with the MEG experiment once the experiment is independently
validated and replicated, then it is the present conventional theory
must be changed, if one follows prescribed scientific method.
To understand how straightforward it is to extract EM energy from the
vacuum, I suggest that my several papers on Department of Energy
be downloaded and
read, particularly the paper "Giant Negentropy from the Common
has also just been published in Journal of New Energy. One
should also read
my paper on the DoE website on "The Unnecessary Energy
Crisis" in order to
understand that all the hydrocarbons ever burned, dams ever built to
hydroturbines to turn the shafts of the generators, and nuclear fuel
ever expended, have not added and will never add a single watt to the
line. All that ferocious destruction of the biosphere has done
force the internal charges of the generators apart, to make the source
dipoles. It is the source dipole that powers every electrical
every power system, not the shaft horsepower input to the generator
Isn't it strange that we have all been taught to design and build only
closed current loop circuits-which a priori destroy their source
(and thus the inflow of free electrical energy from the vacuum) faster
they can catch some of the free energy from the vacuum and use it to
their loads! Until it is understood that all EM energy comes
vacuum anyway, and specifically from the time domain as reactive power
(electrical engineering term), then the operation of systems such as
will make no sense to one at all, and in fact the mechanism actually
powering every EM circuit and electrical power system will not be
I have promised Hal Fox to prepare an article for Journal of New
describing the MEG and its general mechanism for operation, as soon as
independent testing and independent university's full replication are
Also, Dr. Myron Evans, a theoretician of much note, has completed an
scientific paper which provides a succinct and rigorous technical
in O(3) electrodynamics of the MEG's "energy from the
mechanism. Evans demonstrates that the explanation does not
appear at all
in the standard U(1) electrodynamics, but does easily appear rather
straightforwardly in the higher symmetry O(3) electrodynamics, which
non-Abelian EM theory. That AIAS paper has been submitted to a
physics journal and is presently in formal referee review.
We briefed technical representatives of two U.S. Senate committees on
MEG and on overunity electrical power systems in general as part of
briefing (along with excellent briefings by Dr. Eugene Mallove, Dr.
Valone, Dr. Ted Loder, and others) and will brief again-more widely in
Senate and on Capitol Hill-sometime next spring or early summer.
next briefing, we will probably include a live demonstration of the
Both here and abroad, we are actively seeking capitalization by
the non-exclusive manufacturing of scaled up MEG power units, while
retaining control of our fundamental invention. In the not too
future, we will scale up the MEG and see it manufactured by various
licensees worldwide, with units going directly to the market place
power systems powering real loads.
The Managing Partner and Director of Magnetic Energy Limited is Dr.
Kenny, E-mail email@example.com. Lee should be contacted for
regarding the MEG program, program status, plans, investments, company
information, etc. and for any further questions.
Very best wishes,