|The Tom Bearden
|Subject: RE: Question for Tom
Bearden @ PM Motor/Generator
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:45:54 -0500
No, the idea of a permanent magnet
self-powering motor has been pursued by many inventors, and by some of
them successfully. The Steorn group in
Golden and I had run into that effect with a Golden overunity machine which, when relocated several hundred miles, suddenly did not produce COP>1.0 in the new location. We were thunderstruck until Tiller explained it to us.
So the Steorn intended demonstration at some little distance from the original development site was catastrophic to them.
All such successful self-powering asymmetric permanent magnet motors have been ruthlessly suppressed to date. Latest highly suspicious “capture” of a legitimate procedure to make asymmetric permanent magnets – and thus suppress the process from use by our citizens – was by our own U.S. Department of Energy in 2001. Apparently the DoE has also kept this fact – the availability of mass-producing asymmetric permanent magnets with high energy product and thus easily assembling self-powering asymmetric PM motors and motor generators – completely unknown to the President, the Congress, and the American people. There's an article on our website here with the three international patent numbers of interest. In the 2001 patent where DoE “funded a grant that produced the process again, after it had already been invented”, you can see DoE's statement essentially assuming control of the process.
So the idea of an asymmetric
permanent magnet motor is certainly not new with me. The late Howard
Johnson, e.g., pursued it arduously for decades. He succeeded at least
once in achieving such a demonstrable self-powering model that I
personally tested for several hours – and shortly thereafter, that
specific demonstrator was promptly stolen from him by a night-time
very professional break-in to his laboratory in
John Bedini is certainly capable of making such a motor, and he has done so in the past using his own special methods. But presently he is vigorously trying to get his advanced battery chargers into production and onto the market. John and his few assistants are trying to do the work of at least two dozen men, and my hat is off to him for making the most valiant effort I've ever seen to get highly effective systems out there onto the world market.
DeGeus suffered a “mysterious”
fatal heart attack when he parked his car in the
Make a plane of such crystals oriented parallel, and you will increase the available current. Then increase the “depth” by adding other planes behind it, and you also increase the voltage.
So if one gains good control of the process, and can get to other materials by finding how to elicit the self-sustaining dipole effect, then the self-powering battery for self-powering electric automobiles becomes readily possible.
The watergas process is also again very extant, and several inventors have working model systems that produce COP>1.0 easily. Kanzius' process is one such, and his related cancer cure method has passed initial animal testing with 100% success (100% of the cancers in the lab animals were simply and easily cured, without all the harmful radiation etc. and damaging to the animals).
For PM self-powering motors, in theory you can also use "edge switching" (switch the magnetic field in just the edge of a bar magnet, to just a tiny bit of depth) can also be used to make the back mmf region and the forward mmf region asymmetric.
The point is this: It isn't the power that we externally input into a coil in a permanent magnet motor, a coil judicially placed in the back mmf section to allow us to break the symmetry of the back mmf region. That asymmetry – once achieved by any means – is what actually powers the system! All that inputting our paid-for energy to the coil does, is produce the necessary asymmetry.
And the materials and motor and assembly of the motor system care not one hoot how we get that asymmetry to be there. Get it anyway you wish, and the motor will then power itself and a load, taking its input energy directly from the seething virtual state vacuum via that broken symmetry.
Every joule of EM energy in the universe and in all our circuits is already extracted directly from the seething virtual state vacuum by the asymmetry of the source dipole. It is NOT the cranking of the shaft of the generator that powers the circuit! All that cranking input does, is continually restore the source dipole inside the generator that our electrical engineering symmetrical circuits and systems keep destroying faster than they power their loads!
As Tesla (who had discovered energy from the "active medium" circuits three decades earlier) stated in 1919:
The 1892 symmetrization of the Heaviside equations (erroneously taught to our EEs as "Maxwell's theory") was specifically done to stop Tesla cold and prevent him from giving the world free energy systems, taking their energy directly from the "active medium". Quoting Tesla earlier:
So what we should be doing in our vaunted scientific community is coming down on our entire electrical engineering establishment, and brute-forcing them to go back and remove that insane symmetrization of the Heaviside equations that Lorentz shoved on them arbitrarily in 1892.
In short, turn all our young doctoral candidates and post docs loose on the problem of developing and using practical asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, and in two years there will never be an energy crisis again anywhere on this planet.
Advanced physics (Nobelist Lee so stated it himself) already tells us (and has done so for 50 years) that when we do have a broken symmetry, then in that broken symmetry something virtual has been and is being converted to observable.
In short, any broken symmetry such as a dipole or a charge with its surrounding polarized vacuum, is ALREADY extracting and integrating real EM energy from the seething virtual state vacuum energy it continually absorbs, and then pouring this free EM energy (real observable photons) out freely and steadily.
It is astoundingly simple to evoke an everlasting free electromagnetic energy wind from the active vacuum. E.g., just place a charged capacitor on a permanent magnet so that the E-field of the cap is at right angles to the H-field of the magnet. That silly 2-dollar gadget then will sit there endlessly and freely pour out real Poynting EM energy flow S, given by the simple equation S = E X H. That equation is verifiable in every EM textbook in the world, over in the Poynting energy flow theory section.
So for peanuts we can easily get real EM energy flowing freely from the local inexhaustible virtual state vacuum, and it will do so indefinitely. There is no free energy problem! Instead, there is the problem of building and using properly ASYMMETRIC collection and dissipation systems to power our loads.
To make a proper "EM windmill" to intercept and collect some of that easily-achieved and real EM energy flow, and then to SEPARATELY dissipate the collected EM energy in the loads to power them, an ASYMMETRIC system is required.
So our inane electrical engineering profession – since 1892 at its very beginning – has all our electrical engineers building a SYMMETRICAL windmill, and then having us pay to burn fuel etc. to input energy to the "windmill" that does nothing but produce the asymmetry.
We've had group theory in our universities since 1870, for goodness sakes! But if you ask the average EE professor "What were and are the ramifications of Lorentz's symmetrization of the Heaviside equations in 1892, and the continuing symmetrization of these equations today as the "electrical engineering model"?" Then the usual professor has not the foggiest notion of what you have asked him or what you have steered him to.
And as long as our engineers inanely continue to build only SYMMETRICAL Maxwellian/Heaviside systems, then we shall have to continue to feed in energy that we ourselves pay for, to produce the necessary asymmetry.
The energy crisis in this world – and the tragic deaths of hundreds of millions of persons worldwide because of their abject poverty due to no cheap energy for a modern national economy – rests directly on the shoulders of our scientific community, and specifically on the shoulders of our electrical engineering community and profession.
Anyway, with the present rapidly
escalating oil prices and gasoline prices, this nation seems headed
rather immediately toward a great economic collapse also. If the
MidEast explodes (which is likely most any time now), that will
immediately chop off the rest of the MidEast Oil from the
If the big diesel trucks stop for four or five days, the food in our cities will also be depleted (it will not be being replenished daily by the big trucks). In that case, there will quickly be great hunger, rioting, looting, and chaos in our cities – requiring the immediate full application of a very rigorous martial law.
Watch for it! Unless our scientific community very quickly wakes up from its century-long sleep, and gets its head out of the sand in its ostrich position it's been in since 1892, then that's exactly what we are headed for.
Subject: Question for Tom Bearden @ PM Motor/Generator
I have several questions about the asymmetric permanent magnet
Can the Asymmetric PM Motor Generator that you described in the 01
July 07 Technical Paper be correctly called a Bearden Motor? That is
to say, is it your conception?
Will a piece of iron placed on one side of a magnet to reduce the
field strength on that side produce the desired asymmetry?
There are many different formulations of NdFeB that are used for
neodymium magnets, each with different magnetic properties and field
strengths. Can neo magnets be used if the layers consist of different
formulations of NdFeB, each successive layer having less magnetic
field strength (BHmax)? In this case, different formulations are
compacted as thin strips in an aligning magnetic field so that all the
domains are pointing north/south. Then the strips undergo a final
compaction in a die, also within an aligning magnetic field. The
resulting layered magnetic material is then sintered and, finally,
magnetized to saturation.