I’m not a bench person; for that
capability I work with other inventors and researchers who are. So I
cannot help you on the actual circuitry.
However, be advised that
Tesla was also involved with negative
energy (and negative energy
EM fields, which are the “dark energy” all our astrophysicists are so
earnestly seeking), as well as negative
mass-energy currents (which are the “dark matter”
our astrophysicists are seeking and cannot find).
Tesla called negative
energy “radiant energy”, and even filed a patent
Bedini, a close colleague for
several decades, has been using negative
energy (and negative
mass-energy currents) in his battery
charging circuits for some time. Bedini and I have also even filed a
PPA on the evoking and use of negative
energy in EM circuits and systems.
The reason that
it got left out of modern electrodynamics (above the sad old 1880’s
electrical engineering and classical electromagnetics model) is that
Dirac hated negative
energy – which arises from the Schrodinger equation
– and did an artifice to get rid of it from his own theory, or
at least condition others
to ignore it.
Any sharp, strong gradient across
a little bit of space (a little bit of vacuum, a little bit of the
Dirac Sea) will lift out electrons from the Dirac sea holes, providing
a surge of real excess electron current (usually called the Lenz law
effect) which tries to maintain the situation
the sharp gradient is trying to change. The vacated
holes, contrary to what
Dirac convinced everyone by hand-waving, are NOT positrons! They are
in fact negative
mass-energy electrons, and as source charges (while they persist) they
emit negative energy
at light speed, which
emissions constitutes negative
energy EM fields and potentials – the so-called “dark energy” our
astrophysicists have desperately
searched for with telescopes.
mass energy holes are repelled (hey, ANTIGRAVI”TY!) by normal positive
mass energy matter, and
they move in a direction opposite to the normal electrons that
got lifted out. Usually the negative
mass energy hole current goes backwards to ground, where the holes
recombine with electrons and the new pairs of electrons/holes just
turn into pieces of Dirac sea vacuum again. There is no positive
energy EM radiation emitted
when the electron recombines with the Dirac hole; they just disappear.
Positive and negative mass,
equal to each other in magnitude, sum to zero mass without radiation.
On the other hand a POSITIVE mass energy positron, when meeting a
POSITIVE mass energy electron, has annihilation
of the charges, but the mass-energies (being both positive) COMBINE
and that amount of energy
is radiated as normal
positive energy EM field radiation.
Even most physicists have not gone
back and reviewed how Dirac just “arm-waved away” the negative
mass-energy hole he himself had used in his own theory. Instead, the
physicists today largely (and totally erroneously) believe that
a Dirac hole (negative
mass-energy electron, with negative
energy EM fields) and a positron (positive mass-energy electron, with
positive energy EM fields) are the same thing.
They are not.
If you can call me on the phone, I
can discuss this a bit further, and explain the behavioral difference
of positive EM energy flow and negative
EM energy flow in circuits. It is a wonderful difference; if we can
ever get this area funded and research going on in it, then one day
you will be able to take a flashlight battery
and power all of the electrical needs of New York City. I do not
exaggerate, because of one
of the wonderful characteristics of negative
EM energy flow in EM circuits or propagating
along a path.
But it takes some “doing” to build
up the picture of exactly how everything works.